Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add callout on editors section of website about Mason risks #2885

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 19, 2024

Conversation

adam12
Copy link
Contributor

@adam12 adam12 commented Nov 19, 2024

When using Mason to manage Ruby LSP, unless only a single Ruby version is used, there are chances of strange errors due to conflicts of the Ruby ABI.

For anything other than the simplest of deployments, Mason should likely not be used to manage the Ruby LSP or any Ruby IDE tooling.

When using Mason to manage Ruby LSP, unless only a single Ruby version
is used, there are chances of strange errors due to conflicts of the
Ruby ABI.

For anything other than the simplest of deployments, Mason should likely
not be used to manage the Ruby LSP or any Ruby IDE tooling.
@adam12 adam12 requested a review from a team as a code owner November 19, 2024 20:57
Copy link
Member

@vinistock vinistock left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for your contribution!

Yeah, if Mason overrides gem installation paths without considering the Ruby version, then ABI compatibility issues are going to be very common.

And since there's so much variety with version managers, I can imagine it's easy to get into other sorts of trouble as well

@vinistock vinistock added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Nov 19, 2024
@vinistock vinistock merged commit 071aa84 into Shopify:main Nov 19, 2024
20 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants