Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added one more way for navigation in NavigationTest.cs for C# #1996

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: trunk
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Rupesh253
Copy link

@Rupesh253 Rupesh253 commented Oct 14, 2024

User description

Added one more possibility for Navigation

Thanks for contributing to the Selenium site and documentation!
A PR well described will help maintainers to review and merge it quickly

Before submitting your PR, please check our contributing guidelines.
Avoid large PRs, and help reviewers by making them as simple and short as possible.

Description

Motivation and Context

Types of changes

  • Change to the site (I have double-checked the Netlify deployment, and my changes look good)
  • Code example added (and I also added the example to all translated languages)
  • Improved translation
  • Added new translation (and I also added a notice to each document missing translation)

Checklist

  • I have read the contributing document.
  • I have used hugo to render the site/docs locally and I am sure it works.

PR Type

enhancement, documentation


Description

  • Enhanced the NavigationTest.cs by adding comments to clarify the usage of different navigation methods.
  • Introduced an additional example demonstrating the use of driver.Navigate().GoToUrl() with a Uri argument.
  • Improved documentation within the code to aid understanding of navigation options in Selenium.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
NavigationTest.cs
Enhance navigation test with additional example and comments

examples/dotnet/SeleniumDocs/Interactions/NavigationTest.cs

  • Added comments explaining the usage of driver.Url and
    driver.Navigate().GoToUrl().
  • Introduced an additional example using driver.Navigate().GoToUrl()
    with a Uri argument.
  • +5/-2     

    💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

    Added one more possibility for Navigation
    Copy link

    netlify bot commented Oct 14, 2024

    👷 Deploy request for selenium-dev pending review.

    Visit the deploys page to approve it

    Name Link
    🔨 Latest commit add1d0c

    @CLAassistant
    Copy link

    CLA assistant check
    Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
    You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

    @codiumai-pr-agent-pro codiumai-pr-agent-pro bot added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request Review effort [1-5]: 2 labels Oct 14, 2024
    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

    Code Duplication
    The PR introduces duplicate navigation to the same URL ("https://selenium.dev") using different methods. This might lead to confusion and unnecessary test execution time. Consider removing one of the navigation calls or using different URLs to demonstrate the various navigation methods.

    Commented Code
    There is a commented-out line of code demonstrating an additional navigation method. Consider either removing this line or uncommenting it if it's meant to be part of the example.

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    Explore these optional code suggestions:

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Possible issue
    Add a wait condition after navigation to ensure the page has loaded before assertions

    Consider adding a small delay or wait condition after navigation to ensure the page
    has loaded before performing assertions. This can help prevent flaky tests.

    examples/dotnet/SeleniumDocs/Interactions/NavigationTest.cs [20-25]

     driver.Navigate().GoToUrl("https://selenium.dev");
    +
    +WebDriverWait wait = new WebDriverWait(driver, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(10));
    +wait.Until(d => d.Title.Contains("Selenium"));
     
     var title = driver.Title;
     Assert.AreEqual("Selenium", title);
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

    Why: Adding a wait condition is crucial for ensuring that the page has fully loaded before performing assertions, which can prevent flaky tests and improve test reliability.

    9
    Best practice
    Use a constant for repeated URL values to improve maintainability and reduce errors

    Consider using a constant or configuration value for the URL instead of hardcoding
    it multiple times. This improves maintainability and reduces the risk of typos.

    examples/dotnet/SeleniumDocs/Interactions/NavigationTest.cs [18-22]

    -driver.Url = "https://selenium.dev";
    -driver.Navigate().GoToUrl("https://selenium.dev");
    -//driver.Navigate().GoToUrl(new Uri("https://selenium.dev"));
    +const string SeleniumUrl = "https://selenium.dev";
    +driver.Url = SeleniumUrl;
    +driver.Navigate().GoToUrl(SeleniumUrl);
    +//driver.Navigate().GoToUrl(new Uri(SeleniumUrl));
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: This suggestion improves code maintainability by using a constant for the URL, reducing the risk of typos and making it easier to update the URL in one place if needed.

    8

    💡 Need additional feedback ? start a PR chat

    @Rupesh253 Rupesh253 changed the title Update NavigationTest.cs Added one more way for navigation in NavigationTest.cs for C# Oct 14, 2024
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request Review effort [1-5]: 2
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants