You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
3, because the PR introduces new functionality with multiple new classes and methods, which requires a detailed review of the implementation, error handling, and integration with existing code. The added tests indicate some level of complexity.
🧪 Relevant tests
Yes
🔍 Possible issues
Type Checking: In several instances, the type checking could be improved or is incorrect. For example, checking if a URL is an instance of String using instanceof String will fail for string literals.
Error Message Consistency: Some error messages are inconsistent or misleading, potentially causing confusion during debugging.
Consider using typeof url === 'string' instead of instanceof String for checking if url is a string. This change ensures that the check works for both string objects and literals. [important]
Use typeof reasonPhrase === 'string' for the reasonPhrase type check to correctly handle string literals, similar to the suggestion for URL checking in continueRequestParameters.js. [important]
Remove the unused binaryValue parameter and related code from the Header class constructor and properties since it's no longer used in the updated implementation. This simplification will improve code maintainability. [medium]
Update the error message in addIntercept to be more descriptive and consistent with other error messages. For example, include the type of the received parameter to aid in debugging. [medium]
Overview:
The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:
The review tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project.
Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize.
Examples for extra instructions:
[pr_reviewer] # /review #
extra_instructions="""
In the 'possible issues' section, emphasize the following:
- Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
- Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
- Is the code logic efficient?
...
"""
Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.
How to enable\disable automation
When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the review tool is:
pr_commands = ["/review", ...]
meaning the review tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration.
Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations
Auto-labels
The review tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR:
a possible security issue label, that detects possible security issues (enable_review_labels_security flag)
a Review effort [1-5]: x label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (enable_review_labels_effort flag)
Extra sub-tools
The review tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR.
It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case.
Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example: require_score_review, require_soc2_ticket, require_can_be_split_review, and more.
Auto-approve PRs
By invoking:
/review auto_approve
The tool will automatically approve the PR, and add a comment with the approval.
To ensure safety, the auto-approval feature is disabled by default. To enable auto-approval, you need to actively set in a pre-defined configuration file the following:
[pr_reviewer]
enable_auto_approval = true
(this specific flag cannot be set with a command line argument, only in the configuration file, committed to the repository)
You can also enable auto-approval only if the PR meets certain requirements, such as that the estimated_review_effort is equal or below a certain threshold, by adjusting the flag:
[pr_reviewer]
maximal_review_effort = 5
More PR-Agent commands
To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
/describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
Use typeof to check for string type instead of instanceof String.
In the method method, instead of checking if method is an instance of String, which is incorrect because strings are primitive values in JavaScript, use typeof to check if the type of method is 'string'.
-if (!(method instanceof String)) {- throw new Error(`Http method must be an instance of String. Received: '${method})'`)+if (typeof method !== 'string') {+ throw new Error(`Http method must be a string. Received: '${method})'`)
}
Correctly check if a value is an integer using Number.isInteger.
In the statusCode method, use Number.isInteger(statusCode) instead of statusCode.isInteger() to correctly check if statusCode is an integer.
Correct the arguments passed to the Header constructor in the RequestData class.
When creating a new Header instance in the RequestData class, you're passing a BytesValue instance as the second argument, which is incorrect based on the Header constructor definition. Remove the BytesValue wrapping to correctly pass the string value.
-this._headers.push(new Header(name, new BytesValue(value.type, value.value)))+this._headers.push(new Header(name, value))
✨ Improve tool usage guide:
Overview:
The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:
meaning the improve tool will run automatically on every PR, with summarization enabled. Delete this line to disable the tool from running automatically.
Utilizing extra instructions
Extra instructions are very important for the improve tool, since they enable to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project.
Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on.
Examples for extra instructions:
[pr_code_suggestions] # /improve #
extra_instructions="""
Emphasize the following aspects:
- Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
- Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
- Is the code logic efficient?
...
"""
Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.
A note on code suggestions quality
While the current AI for code is getting better and better (GPT-4), it's not flawless. Not all the suggestions will be perfect, and a user should not accept all of them automatically.
Suggestions are not meant to be simplistic. Instead, they aim to give deep feedback and raise questions, ideas and thoughts to the user, who can then use his judgment, experience, and understanding of the code base.
Recommended to use the 'extra_instructions' field to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project, or use the custom suggestions 💎 tool
With large PRs, best quality will be obtained by using 'improve --extended' mode.
More PR-Agent commands
To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
/describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
pujagani
force-pushed
the
add-network-command
branch
from
codiumai-pr-agent-pro
bot
added
Review effort [1-5]: 3
and removed
Review effort [1-5]: 4
labels
User description
Thanks for contributing to Selenium!
A PR well described will help maintainers to quickly review and merge it
Before submitting your PR, please check our contributing guidelines.
Avoid large PRs, help reviewers by making them as simple and short as possible.
Description
Add
continueRequestandcontinueResponsecommands that are part of the Network module as defined in the BiDi Spec https://w3c.github.io/webdriver-bidi/#module-network.Motivation and Context
Types of changes
Checklist
Type
enhancement, tests
Description
ContinueRequestParametersandContinueResponseParametersclasses to handle request and response continuation parameters respectively.continueRequestandcontinueResponsemethods in theNetworkclass to support continuation of network requests and responses.Headerclass and its usages to streamline handling of request and response headers.Changes walkthrough
continueRequestParameters.js
Add ContinueRequestParameters Class for Request Continuationjavascript/node/selenium-webdriver/bidi/continueRequestParameters.js
ContinueRequestParametersclass for handling requestcontinuation parameters.
URL.
expected types.
continueResponseParameters.js
Add ContinueResponseParameters Class for Response Continuationjavascript/node/selenium-webdriver/bidi/continueResponseParameters.js
ContinueResponseParametersclass for handling responsecontinuation parameters.
phrase, and status code.
expected types.
network.js
Implement ContinueRequest and ContinueResponse Methods in NetworkClassjavascript/node/selenium-webdriver/bidi/network.js
continueRequestandcontinueResponsemethods to theNetworkclass.
addInterceptmethod.networkTypes.js
Update Header Class and Related Usagesjavascript/node/selenium-webdriver/bidi/networkTypes.js
Headerclass constructor to removebinaryValue.RequestDataclass to adapt toHeaderchanges.Headerclass.network_commands_test.js
Add Tests for ContinueRequest and ContinueResponse Functionalitiesjavascript/node/selenium-webdriver/test/bidi/network_commands_test.js
continueRequestandcontinueResponsefunctionalities.ContinueRequestParametersandContinueResponseParametersintests.