executor: decompress gzip paloyads before logging them

[RafalSkolasinski]

What this PR does / why we need it:

This is temporary fix until we can close #3690.
It is to ensure that CloudEvents send to the logging endpoint are not compressed.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #3749

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

[RafalSkolasinski]

/test integration

[RafalSkolasinski]

/test notebooks

[RafalSkolasinski]

/test integration

[RafalSkolasinski]

/test notebooks

[RafalSkolasinski]

Integration failure:

• TestPrepack.test_mlflow_v2

Notebook failures:

• TestNotebooks.test_explainer_examples
• TestNotebooks.test_upgrade

[RafalSkolasinski]

/test integration

[RafalSkolasinski]

/test notebooks

[axsaucedo]

/test notebooks

[axsaucedo]

NIce one - looks good, rerunning notebook tests

[RafalSkolasinski]

Now integration test failures on:

• TestPrepack.test_mlflow_v2
• TestPrepack.test_xgboost_v2

which would indicate that integration failures are caused by flakiness.

[RafalSkolasinski]

Notebook failure on same tests now. I believe TestNotebooks.test_upgrade was broken but I am not sure about explainer examples one. Will run again and if still failure will verify locally.

[RafalSkolasinski]

/test notebooks

[axsaucedo]

JUst had a look, TestNotebooks.test_upgrade is expected to fail as the -dev helm charts were pushed which would affect that test specifically, so can be ignored given that integration tests upgrade works.

I can see that TestNotebooks.test_explainer_examples is indeed failing again, so it may actually be an issue so would suggest running locally.

Integration tests failing seem to be only v2 ones which are known to be flaky, but I would have another look just in case.

/test integration

[seldondev]

@RafalSkolasinski: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name	Commit	Details	Rerun command
notebooks	0eafdc9	link	/test notebooks
integration	0eafdc9	link	/test integration

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the jenkins-x/lighthouse repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[axsaucedo]

Seems integration tests are indeed failing on just flaky tests, but notebook tests do indeed seem to consistently fail on explainer tests, would be worth running locally to validate

[RafalSkolasinski]

@axsaucedo we confirmed with @sakoush that the explainer notebook failure is related to the use of recent changes in explainers when using kfserving protocol. @sakoush will look into fixing the notebook.

Looks like we can go ahead and merge this one!

[axsaucedo]

Perfecto - thanks @RafalSkolasinski

/approve

[seldondev]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: axsaucedo

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [axsaucedo]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment