-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 835
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rclone as default storage initalizer #3159
Conversation
/test integration |
/test notebooks |
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
To note: integration and notebook tests passed in a commit prior to one containing docs changes. |
- Minio-compatible (using `s3://`) | ||
- Azure Blob storage (using `https://(.+?).blob.core.windows.net/(.+)`) | ||
|
||
A Kubernetes PersistentVolume [can be used](../examples/pvc-tfjob.html) instead of a bucket using `pvc://`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One thing I am not sure is if this is feature of SC Operator or the kfserving storage initialiser?
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ singleNamespace: false | |||
storageInitializer: | |||
cpuLimit: "1" | |||
cpuRequest: 100m | |||
image: gcr.io/kfserving/storage-initializer:v0.4.0 | |||
image: seldonio/rclone-storage-initializer:1.8.0-dev |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would this be covered by the release.py?
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: axsaucedo The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What this PR does / why we need it:
Make rclone storage initializer default in Seldon Core 1.8
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Closes #2942
Closes #1028
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: