Add raw_data parameter to SeldonClient predict #3095
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
RafalSkolasinski
suggested changes
Mar 26, 2021
adriangonz
reviewed
Mar 26, 2021
|
Looks good |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: axsaucedo The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this PR does / why we need it:
Add raw_data parameter to SeldonClient predict. enable raw payload for REST/gRpc.
Add unit testing and upadate sklearn_iris notebook eample to include raw_data use example.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
#3079
Fixes #3079
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:
NONE