-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 835
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
2271 feedback reward custom metrics #2289
2271 feedback reward custom metrics #2289
Conversation
Mon Aug 17 13:25:39 UTC 2020 impatient try |
Mon Aug 17 13:25:58 UTC 2020 impatient try |
Mon Aug 17 16:10:56 UTC 2020 impatient try |
Mon Aug 17 16:11:12 UTC 2020 impatient try |
/test this |
Mon Aug 17 18:57:12 UTC 2020 impatient try |
e5b9626
to
5f265ef
Compare
Rebasing master |
/test this |
Mon Aug 17 19:00:43 UTC 2020 impatient try |
Mon Aug 17 19:00:43 UTC 2020 impatient try |
Mon Aug 17 19:01:00 UTC 2020 impatient try |
Integration tests pass, and python tests pass locally, not sure why lint and pr-build are failing. Lint seems to be failing due to licenses, but pr-build seems to be failing on the operator tests which has nothing to do with pr... /test this |
Tue Aug 18 05:28:27 UTC 2020 impatient try |
Tue Aug 18 05:28:39 UTC 2020 impatient try |
It seems lint test is now fixed and PR build tests are passing except for a flaky test |
Tue Aug 18 06:00:35 UTC 2020 impatient try |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good! Surprised we didn't have an example of this already.
Couple of questions, should we create a documentation page for feedback to go with the example? Also, I see you are using requests
to send feedback, does this mean that the seldon client doesn't implement this?
Thanks @jklaise! In regards to your first question, the answer is definitely, the next PR will be to add documentation to provide insights on the existing capabilities but also the current discussions (as the existing endpoints will be depricated). In regards to the second question, that is a very good point, I could've used the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice one!
@@ -80,6 +80,14 @@ def split_image_tag(tag: str) -> Tuple[str]: | |||
DEFAULT_LABELS["image_name"] = DEFAULT_LABELS["model_image"] | |||
DEFAULT_LABELS["image_version"] = DEFAULT_LABELS["model_version"] | |||
|
|||
FEEDBACK_METRIC_METHOD_TAG = "feedback" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could probably later on change this list of constants into one enum
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jklaise, RafalSkolasinski The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Wed Aug 19 09:08:40 UTC 2020 impatient try |
Wed Aug 19 09:08:54 UTC 2020 impatient try |
5f265ef
to
6e1e790
Compare
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
Wed Aug 19 13:32:47 UTC 2020 impatient try |
Wed Aug 19 13:34:09 UTC 2020 impatient try |
@axsaucedo: The following test failed, say
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the jenkins-x/lighthouse repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
PR includes: