-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 835
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
assaf-java-s2i-update #2178
assaf-java-s2i-update #2178
Conversation
Hi @amoldavsky. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a SeldonIO member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the jenkins-x/lighthouse repository. |
…to assaf-java-s2i-update
…to assaf-java-s2i-update
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for your contribution @amoldavsky ! I've left a couple comments below regarding the versions of the default Docker images (which are a bit outdated). Besides that, everything else looks good!
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ | |||
FROM seldonio/core-builder:0.3 | |||
ARG IMAGE_SOURCE=seldonio/core-builder:0.3 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you try bumping the core-builder
image to 0.16
(which is the latest)?
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ | |||
FROM openjdk:8u131-jre-alpine | |||
ARG IMAGE_SOURCE=openjdk:8u131-jre-alpine |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Similarly as above, could you also bump the runtime base to openjdk:13.0.1-jdk-buster
(which is what the latest core-builder
uses)?
/approve Nice one @amoldavsky ! Thanks for adding those changes in. I think this is good to go now. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: adriangonz The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What this PR does / why we need it:
Allows more flexibility around the S2I builds by allowing the
source image to be specified as a Docker build argument.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
You can either build the same way as before, OR you can do custom...
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: