-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 835
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tags backward compatibility in executor #1481
Conversation
Tue Feb 25 14:19:13 UTC 2020 impatient try |
Tue Feb 25 14:19:22 UTC 2020 impatient try |
Wed Feb 26 16:40:34 UTC 2020 impatient try |
Wed Feb 26 16:40:48 UTC 2020 impatient try |
Wed Feb 26 17:41:17 UTC 2020 impatient try |
Wed Feb 26 17:41:17 UTC 2020 impatient try |
Wed Feb 26 17:45:14 UTC 2020 impatient try |
Wed Feb 26 17:45:15 UTC 2020 impatient try |
Wed Feb 26 17:52:33 UTC 2020 impatient try |
Wed Feb 26 17:53:47 UTC 2020 impatient try |
/test integration |
Thu Feb 27 10:36:56 UTC 2020 impatient try |
/retest |
Thu Feb 27 11:58:13 UTC 2020 impatient try |
Thu Feb 27 13:53:00 UTC 2020 impatient try |
Thu Feb 27 13:52:59 UTC 2020 impatient try |
Thu Feb 27 13:58:13 UTC 2020 impatient try |
Thu Feb 27 13:58:23 UTC 2020 impatient try |
Tue Mar 3 10:20:07 UTC 2020 impatient try |
The midnight integration tests failed on
I have now rebased on master and squash commits. We will see how this run will finish. |
Now locally it failed for me on
|
This is the rolling_updates tests failing all the time. My new tests seems to be passing. |
/retest |
Tue Mar 3 13:00:39 UTC 2020 impatient try |
/retest |
Tue Mar 3 16:38:28 UTC 2020 impatient try |
/retest |
Tue Mar 3 19:16:58 UTC 2020 impatient try |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Really solid tests, and nice one changing prints to logging.info. I added a brief set of followup comments on the way meta is dealt with, but other than that looks good.
Test do seem to be failing due to flakeyness as in the latest one only 1 failed. @RafalSkolasinski can you confirm the tests pass locally? If so happy to merge!
/test integration |
I have increased flakiness, we will see if it will pass now. |
Wed Mar 4 11:24:57 UTC 2020 impatient try |
Wed Mar 4 11:25:35 UTC 2020 impatient try |
Wed Mar 4 11:26:23 UTC 2020 impatient try |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks solid!
/approve
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: axsaucedo The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@RafalSkolasinski: The following test failed, say
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
All tests pass locally now. The latest problem was with new notebook tests. The only one that I didn't manage to run is
which is quite odd because I verified that corresponding notebook run without any problems. @cliveseldon |
Closes #1474.
To avoid missing some important details in between @seldondev messages I will post general updates to the issue itself.