-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Sort by recency vs sort by year (descending) #47
Comments
"Sorted by Recency" will sort the documents by vtime which is version time. I guess it means the time that the document being added into/updated in CiteSeerX database. |
Thanks for the clarification. It makes sense from a system admin's perspective. However, I guess the term "recency" may confuse users (at least it confuses me for a while). Maybe we should explicitly say sorted by "ingestion time"? |
I agree, or maybe we should get rid of it. Thanks On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:29 PM, hhchen1105 [email protected]
|
Instead of "recency" use the phrase "ingestion recency" On 11/24/15 10:32 PM, Jian Wu wrote:
|
I think it might be confusing to users. Perhaps"Recently Added"? On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:45 AM, C Lee Giles [email protected]
|
How about just "Recently Added to CSX" I think with the other options it's prolly helpful to specify what it's been added to. |
What is the difference between "sort by recency" and "sort by year (descending)"?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: