Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix redshift/postgres beginning_of_all_times unknown ghost record values #260

Merged

Conversation

tkiehn
Copy link
Collaborator

@tkiehn tkiehn commented Sep 26, 2024

Description

beginning_of_all_times_date was used instead of beginning_of_all_times, therefore if the defaults were not changed the ghost record value of the unknown records had 00:00:00 instead of 00:00:01 as time.
This results in incorrect filtering of the ghost records by timestamp downstream

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

beginning_of_all_times_date was used instead of beginning_of_all_times, therefore if the defaults were not changed the ghost record value of the unknown records had 00:00:00 instead of 00:00:01 as time.
@tkiehn tkiehn added the testing To trigger the automated test workflow as internal User. label Sep 26, 2024
@tkiehn tkiehn requested a review from tderk September 26, 2024 08:33
@remoteworkflow
Copy link

Link to workflow summary: https://github.com/ScalefreeCOM/datavault4dbt-ci-cd/actions/runs/11048578076


RESULTS for Synapse:
✅ dbt-tests
✅ dbt-macro-tests


RESULTS for Postgres:
✅ dbt-tests
✅ dbt-macro-tests


RESULTS for BigQuery:
✅ dbt-tests
✅ dbt-macro-tests


RESULTS for Redshift:
✅ dbt-tests
✅ dbt-macro-tests


RESULTS for Snowflake:
✅ dbt-tests
✅ dbt-macro-tests


RESULTS for Exasol:
❌ dbt-tests
✅ dbt-macro-tests

@remoteworkflow remoteworkflow bot removed the testing To trigger the automated test workflow as internal User. label Sep 26, 2024
@tkiehn tkiehn merged commit 3407863 into main Sep 27, 2024
1 check passed
@tkiehn tkiehn deleted the fix-redshift-postgres-unknown-values-of-beginning-of-all-times branch September 27, 2024 08:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants