Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 17, 2023. It is now read-only.

health: implemented check for LDAP #1828

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 23, 2018

Conversation

mssola
Copy link
Collaborator

@mssola mssola commented May 23, 2018

In order to implement this, I needed to move things a bit on the LDAP
support. So much, that I ended up refactoring quite some pieces that
needed it.

Fixes #1810

Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà [email protected]

In order to implement this, I needed to move things a bit on the LDAP
support. So much, that I ended up refactoring quite some pieces that
needed it.

Fixes SUSE#1810

Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <[email protected]>
@mssola mssola requested a review from vitoravelino May 23, 2018 11:47
@mssola
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mssola commented May 23, 2018

There are some possible tests still failing.

@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ def self.ready

res = ::Registry.get.client.reachable?
["registry is#{res ? "" : " not"} reachable", res]

# TODO: rescue ::Portus::RequestError instead of simply bailing
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is to be done on another PR

Copy link
Contributor

@vitoravelino vitoravelino left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice refactoring. Thanks! 👍 👏

@vitoravelino vitoravelino merged commit 29e188e into SUSE:master May 23, 2018
@mssola mssola deleted the ldap-health-check branch May 23, 2018 13:29
mssola added a commit to mssola/Portus that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2018
This is a regression that happened after merging SUSE#1828.

Fixes SUSE#1850

Signed-off-by: Miquel Sabaté Solà <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants