-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dev friendly amp improvements and windows support #1004
Dev friendly amp improvements and windows support #1004
Conversation
…on[s] for clarity
Might address #1001 |
.getFile() + | ||
AmplificationHelper.PATH_SEPARATOR + dependencies; | ||
} | ||
// if (!dependencies.contains("junit" + File.separator + "junit" + File.separator + "4")) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If this code is no longer useful, please remove it completely
Hi @lacinoire |
Hey @danglotb, |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1004 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 72.73% 72.91% +0.17%
- Complexity 1482 1486 +4
============================================
Files 134 134
Lines 6359 6364 +5
Branches 757 757
============================================
+ Hits 4625 4640 +15
+ Misses 1395 1386 -9
+ Partials 339 338 -1
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
This required to change the test cases including CommentTest#testAmplifierComments, hopefully making it no longer flaky.
The amplification is still non-deterministic, though the test now only checks for presence of the comment, not the exact change that was made in the test.