Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add technical user deletion logic and adjust exception handling for encryption #50

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 17, 2024

Conversation

Phil91
Copy link
Collaborator

@Phil91 Phil91 commented Jul 2, 2024

Description

  • add delete technical user endpoint
  • add technical user deletion process
  • adjust exceptionhandling for encryption

Why

To provide the delete logic for the portal backend and handle missing encryption keys without killing the process worker

Issue

N/A

Checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have successfully tested my changes locally
  • I have added tests that prove my changes work
  • I have checked that new and existing tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added copyright and license headers, footers (for .md files) or files (for images)

@Phil91 Phil91 requested a review from evegufy July 2, 2024 13:47
@Phil91 Phil91 force-pushed the feature/technicalUserDelete branch from 4550b4e to 5475314 Compare July 17, 2024 15:36
@Phil91 Phil91 changed the title feat(technicalUser): add technical user deletion logic feat: add technical user deletion logic and adjust exception handling for credentials Jul 17, 2024
@Phil91 Phil91 changed the title feat: add technical user deletion logic and adjust exception handling for credentials feat: add technical user deletion logic and adjust exception handling for encryption Jul 17, 2024
@Phil91 Phil91 merged commit a140a48 into main Jul 17, 2024
5 checks passed
@Phil91 Phil91 deleted the feature/technicalUserDelete branch July 17, 2024 16:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants