Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[BUG] Performance storage: make MikroORM integration works #42

Open
1 task done
jerome-benoit opened this issue Jun 9, 2022 · 1 comment
Open
1 task done

[BUG] Performance storage: make MikroORM integration works #42

jerome-benoit opened this issue Jun 9, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working simulator Simulator

Comments

@jerome-benoit
Copy link
Contributor

Duplicate issue

  • I've searched for any related issues and avoided creating a duplicate issue.

Description

No response

e-mobility-charging-stations-simulator version

No response

Node.js Version

No response

System

No response

Expected result

No response

Actual result

No response

Attachments

No response
@jerome-benoit jerome-benoit added the bug Something isn't working label Jun 9, 2022
@jerome-benoit
Copy link
Contributor Author

Initial investigation seems to show that MikroORM and worker-threads do not play nicely together.

JulianHBuecher pushed a commit to JulianHBuecher/e-mobility-charging-stations-simulator that referenced this issue May 24, 2023
@LucasBrazi06
Merge pull request SAP#42 from sap-labs-france/dependabot/npm_and_yar…
4b4b56c 
…n/types/node-16.9.6

Bump @types/node from 16.9.4 to 16.9.6
@jerome-benoit jerome-benoit added the simulator Simulator label Feb 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug Something isn't working simulator Simulator
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@jerome-benoit