-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
styler.equals::style_pkg()
makes fewer corrections than styler::style_pkg()
#3
Comments
The intention was for everything to be equivalent now. Indeed that's what I thought would happen based on what's in this package. Can you provide more detail on what did not change with this package vs |
OK update on this:
From https://github.com/lorenzwalthert/styler.yours README (I had incorrectly assumed So work to do! |
Not that much work to do... It's to change this Lines 15 to 56 in d4e4fc9
So it's more like Any ideas/help with that v. welcome, I guess a reasonable starting point would be try the whole tidyverse. Personally I'd like a few tweaks compared with the tidyverse, favouring |
Thanks for the reply. Perhaps even keep a few different styles in the package? |
Finally looking at this... |
I think this is fixed now.. |
From pola-rs/r-polars#214
Thanks for working on this.
I tried
styler.equals::style_pkg()
on the polars package, but it was necessary to run it afterstyler::style_pkg()
because the modifications were not made as expected.Are differences other than assign operators intentional?
Or do you plan to make all but the assignment operator equivalent to
styler::style_pkg()
in the future?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: