Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Plans on supporting AsyncAPI? #1126

Closed
tino-prahl opened this issue Jun 9, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #1127
Closed

Plans on supporting AsyncAPI? #1126

tino-prahl opened this issue Jun 9, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #1127

Comments

@tino-prahl
Copy link

Currently we are using Redocly CLI for bundling and linting our OpenAPI spec files.
We also providing some of our guidelines as linter rules: https://github.com/otto-de/api-guidelines/#api-linting

In the future we might want to lint our AsyncAPI spec files and also add custom linter rules.

Are you planning to support AsyncAPI?

Thanks! I'd love to hear back from you.

@RomanHotsiy
Copy link
Member

Yes, we plan to support it. But after 1.0 release.

There was some progress on it but we don't have time to finish it faster: #1127

@adamaltman
Copy link
Member

@tino-prahl and @BirgitBader did a great job with API guidelines and implementing corresponding lint rules to enforce them. Maybe there would be some interest to share more content about this with the world?

The world needs more shining examples like this one to help inspire and guide them. Thanks.

@lornajane
Copy link
Contributor

@tino-prahl out of curiosity, which bindings do you use in AsyncAPI? I'm chipping away at that branch that @RomanHotsiy shared and might have something for you to play with in the coming weeks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants