Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(subscribeOn): remove subscribeOn from reexport to support treesha… #2899

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 5, 2017

Conversation

jasonaden
Copy link
Collaborator

@jasonaden jasonaden commented Oct 4, 2017

…kability

There is more research to be done (see #2900), but right now subscribeOn needs to be removed from operators/index.ts. Having it in there pulls in a tree totaling around 20k unminified. The tree that gets pulled in includes subscribeOn, schedulers/asap, AsapAction, ImmediateDefiniton, root, and a bit more.

@rxjs-bot
Copy link

rxjs-bot commented Oct 4, 2017

Messages
📖

CJS: 1348.0KB, global: 747.2KB (gzipped: 140.5KB), min: 145.3KB (gzipped: 30.7KB)

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.0004%) to 97.465% when pulling 8a18986 on jasonaden:remove_subscribeOn_operators into c5b1e42 on ReactiveX:master.

@benlesh
Copy link
Member

benlesh commented Oct 4, 2017

This look good... I think removing this ahead of a 5.5 release is better than including it and having it cause hard to explain bundle size problems for people. Especially given our top priority is decreasing deployment size for people. We can always readd it later and not break semver.

@benlesh
Copy link
Member

benlesh commented Oct 4, 2017

ping @kwonoj for second opinion.

Copy link
Member

@benlesh benlesh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you please file an issue and link it in the comment.

Simply adding a link to the issue tracking the reason subscribeOn was omitted.
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 4, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.0004%) to 97.465% when pulling 8a18986 on jasonaden:remove_subscribeOn_operators into c5b1e42 on ReactiveX:master.

@benlesh benlesh merged commit fb51a02 into ReactiveX:master Oct 5, 2017
@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Jun 6, 2018

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 6, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants