Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

1.x: Completable add doOnEach #4460

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 2, 2016
Merged

1.x: Completable add doOnEach #4460

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 2, 2016

Conversation

vanniktech
Copy link
Collaborator

First part of #4457

Is it okay that I reused Notification like that?

Also are there any Java 6 Generics missing? It would be nice if this project was set up to target Java SDK 6, as my default seems to be Java 8 and I don't get any errors shown in the IDE.

@akarnokd
Copy link
Member

akarnokd commented Sep 1, 2016

Okay but you have generics problem.

@vanniktech
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Alright it's fixed now.

@codecov-io
Copy link

Current coverage is 84.23% (diff: 100%)

Merging #4460 into 1.x will increase coverage by <.01%

@@                1.x      #4460   diff @@
==========================================
  Files           271        271          
  Lines         17602      17610     +8   
  Methods           0          0          
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches       2683       2684     +1   
==========================================
+ Hits          14826      14833     +7   
- Misses         1918       1921     +3   
+ Partials        858        856     -2   

Powered by Codecov. Last update 30da1aa...eacbf59

@akarnokd
Copy link
Member

akarnokd commented Sep 1, 2016

👍

@akarnokd akarnokd merged commit d4d55f0 into ReactiveX:1.x Sep 2, 2016
@vanniktech vanniktech deleted the 1.x_completable_do_on_each branch September 2, 2016 09:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants