Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fixing conda binary build via optional RMS install (dependent on #2631) #2641

Open
wants to merge 13 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Fixing conda binary build via optional RMS install (dependent on #2631) #2641

wants to merge 13 commits into from
+392 −276

Conversation

JacksonBurns
Copy link
Contributor

#2539 managed to fix the conda binary build but grew dramatically out of proportion.

#2631 picks up the earliest of those changes (making RMS optional and avoiding superfluous Julia operations) but there is some disagreement about moving forward with the former. This resulted in #2636, which seeks to fix the conda recipe without merging the changes in #2631 (or, at least, without making RMS optional).

This PR takes the opposite approach and instead picks up the remaining dependent changes from #2539 and will attempt to fix the conda recipe assuming that RMS is optional. This PR is blocked by #2631 but will (hopefully) demonstrate the value in merging it.

Note that there is also an ongoing effort in #2640 (and the corresponding PR in RMS) that would (hopefully) simplify merging #2636.

We will build these binaries one way or the other (hopefully)!

@github-actions GitHub Actions

This comment was marked as outdated.

Sign in to view
@codecov Codecov

This comment was marked as off-topic.

Sign in to view
@JacksonBurns JacksonBurns force-pushed the fix/conda_recipe_pure_python branch 2 times, most recently from 0b2ff2e to 3f085e4 Compare March 23, 2024 18:48
@github-actions GitHub Actions

This comment was marked as outdated.

Sign in to view
@JacksonBurns JacksonBurns force-pushed the fix/conda_recipe_pure_python branch 2 times, most recently from ec4a93e to ec5b0f9 Compare March 26, 2024 01:30
@JacksonBurns
Copy link
Contributor Author

JacksonBurns commented Mar 26, 2024 •
edited
Loading

The libcrypt header file reported missing in previous attempted builds is not related to the system-level package libcrypt1, which is already installed in the runners by default.

edit: ah, so the above error is caused by our old version of Python. See the solution here and the cause the solution mentioned here.

Interestingly the MacOS build actually worked, but the package failed the tests: https://github.com/ReactionMechanismGenerator/RMG-Py/actions/runs/8397857034/job/23001870179

edit to the edit: the error in the macos build was because rmg database conda package was not included in the run or test dependencies

@JacksonBurns

This comment was marked as outdated.

Sign in to view
@github-actions GitHub Actions

This comment was marked as outdated.

Sign in to view
@github-actions GitHub Actions

This comment was marked as outdated.

Sign in to view
@JacksonBurns

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view
@github-actions GitHub Actions

This comment was marked as outdated.

Sign in to view
@JacksonBurns
Copy link
Contributor Author

JacksonBurns commented Mar 31, 2024 •
edited
Loading

@mjohnson541 @rwest @hwpang this PR has now fixed the conda binaries by allowing for an optional RMS installation.

Users wishing to install RMG+RMS from conda can now do so by first running conda install rmg -c rmg and then running the typical RMS build instructions (i.e. add Julia, pyrms, install pycall, build RMS, etc) that are currently being done in our CI (see the updated doc page for detailed instructions).

Please let me know what you think. Here's is a link to the diff for just the commits that are part of this PR, since it also includes some from 2631: https://github.com/ReactionMechanismGenerator/RMG-Py/pull/2641/files/24284bcaf5161d23f14201ed053a4f44f883dba6..f6be0ad41ef8ab52855c333b7660c206c9c0b90d

The changes for this PR are now all in this commit: 3f3d32e

@JacksonBurns JacksonBurns marked this pull request as ready for review March 31, 2024 02:17
@JacksonBurns JacksonBurns self-assigned this Mar 31, 2024
@JacksonBurns JacksonBurns added the Status: Blocked by PR This PR is dependent on another PR label Mar 31, 2024
@github-actions GitHub Actions

This comment was marked as outdated.

Sign in to view
@rwest
Copy link
Member

rwest commented Mar 31, 2024

Just wondering: What happened (or is happening) with #2636? Still feasible?
Conda install RMG then add Julia, pyrms, install pycall, build RMS, etc etc is not an ideal user experience, if compared to just a Conda install.

Still, it's good to make progress, so well done figuring stuff out here. I've not had a chance to look properly yet

@JacksonBurns
Copy link
Contributor Author

Just wondering: What happened (or is happening) with #2636? Still feasible? Conda install RMG then add Julia, pyrms, install pycall, build RMS, etc etc is not an ideal user experience, if compared to just a Conda install.

Bogged down bc of build failures which were either in the conda recipe itself or in the way we extended it to use Julia. Now that the conda recipe works here, I will pull the relevant commits into there so we can be sure the only issues remaining are because of the Julia extensions.

@JacksonBurns JacksonBurns mentioned this pull request Mar 31, 2024
Closed
@github-actions GitHub Actions

This comment was marked as outdated.

Sign in to view
@JacksonBurns

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view
@JacksonBurns JacksonBurns mentioned this pull request Jun 6, 2024
Closed
@JacksonBurns JacksonBurns mentioned this pull request Jun 11, 2024
Closed
@JacksonBurns JacksonBurns mentioned this pull request Jun 12, 2024
Closed
JacksonBurns and others added 3 commits June 12, 2024 10:08
@JacksonBurns
conda now uses libmamba by default, update docs
9c8667d
@JacksonBurns
indicate that Julia is optional but recommended, list features
24a0731 
also update the final run example - the point of specifying the `PYTHONPATH` was so that users _don't_ have to give the full path to `rmg.py` - the `python` executable can search it out
@JacksonBurns @hwpang
Apply suggestions from code review
dcef9ab 
- clearer error messages

Co-authored-by: Hao-Wei Pang <[email protected]>
JacksonBurns and others added 4 commits June 12, 2024 14:18
@JacksonBurns
remove unnesecary NO_JULIA check
d541afc
@JacksonBurns
import logging instead of warnings
d8607f9
@JacksonBurns
fix conda recipe; see extended description
bd8edf9 
 - remove disused lines in `.conda/build.sh`
 - remove disused lines in `.conda/conda_build_config.yaml`
 - updates the conda recipe itself by updating the dependencies to match the latest environment file and updates the test commands to remove the windows tests
 - overhaul the `conda build` action to test the build continuously and to build on all supported platforms
 - update the binary installation instructions
 - set `python` as the default runner for rmg instead of `python-jl`
 - fix an incorrect filepath in the `setup.py`
@JacksonBurns
DROP ME get rmgdatabase from personal channel for testing build, see ext
1353b2a 
the official build is out of date, and I don't want to push the updated rmgdatabase binaries to the official channel before getting RMG-Py working as well
@JacksonBurns
Copy link
Contributor Author

The blocking PR is set to automerge, so I have rebased this one onto #2631 to check if the build still works as expected

@JacksonBurns JacksonBurns removed the Status: Blocked by PR This PR is dependent on another PR label Jun 12, 2024
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

Regression Testing Results

WARNING:root:Initial mole fractions do not sum to one; normalizing.
WARNING:root:Initial mole fractions do not sum to one; normalizing.
WARNING:root:Initial mole fractions do not sum to one; normalizing.
⚠️ One or more regression tests failed.
Please download the failed results and run the tests locally or check the log to see why.

Detailed regression test results.

Regression test aromatics:

Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:01:05
Current: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:01:02
Reference: Memory used: 2765.54 MB
Current: Memory used: 2746.68 MB

aromatics Passed Core Comparison ✅

Original model has 15 species.
Test model has 15 species. ✅
Original model has 11 reactions.
Test model has 11 reactions. ✅

aromatics Passed Edge Comparison ✅

Original model has 106 species.
Test model has 106 species. ✅
Original model has 358 reactions.
Test model has 358 reactions. ✅

Observables Test Case: Aromatics Comparison

✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.500 on average between old model and new model in all conditions!

aromatics Passed Observable Testing ✅

Regression test liquid_oxidation:

Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:02:08
Current: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:02:02
Reference: Memory used: 2911.88 MB
Current: Memory used: 2860.83 MB

liquid_oxidation Passed Core Comparison ✅

Original model has 37 species.
Test model has 37 species. ✅
Original model has 216 reactions.
Test model has 216 reactions. ✅

liquid_oxidation Passed Edge Comparison ✅

Original model has 202 species.
Test model has 202 species. ✅
Original model has 1610 reactions.
Test model has 1610 reactions. ✅

Observables Test Case: liquid_oxidation Comparison

✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.100 on average between old model and new model in all conditions!

liquid_oxidation Passed Observable Testing ✅

Regression test nitrogen:

Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:01:23
Current: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:01:12
Reference: Memory used: 2903.45 MB
Current: Memory used: 2865.72 MB

nitrogen Failed Core Comparison ❌

Original model has 41 species.
Test model has 41 species. ✅
Original model has 360 reactions.
Test model has 359 reactions. ❌
The original model has 1 reactions that the tested model does not have. ❌
rxn: HNO(48) + HCO(13) <=> NO(38) + CH2O(18) origin: H_Abstraction

nitrogen Failed Edge Comparison ❌

Original model has 132 species.
Test model has 132 species. ✅
Original model has 997 reactions.
Test model has 995 reactions. ❌

Non-identical thermo! ❌
original: O1[C]=N1
tested: O1[C]=N1

Hf(300K) S(300K) Cp(300K) Cp(400K) Cp(500K) Cp(600K) Cp(800K) Cp(1000K) Cp(1500K)
116.46 53.90 11.62 12.71 13.49 13.96 14.14 13.85 13.58
141.64 58.66 12.26 12.27 12.09 11.96 12.26 12.72 12.15

thermo: Thermo group additivity estimation: group(O2s-CdN3d) + group(N3d-OCd) + group(Cd-HN3dO) + ring(Cyclopropene) + radical(CdJ-NdO)
thermo: Thermo group additivity estimation: group(O2s-CdN3d) + group(N3d-OCd) + group(Cd-HN3dO) + ring(oxirene) + radical(CdJ-NdO)
The original model has 2 reactions that the tested model does not have. ❌
rxn: HNO(48) + HCO(13) <=> NO(38) + CH2O(18) origin: H_Abstraction
rxn: HON(T)(83) + HCO(13) <=> NO(38) + CH2O(18) origin: Disproportionation

Non-identical kinetics! ❌
original:
rxn: NCO(66) <=> O1[C]=N1(126) origin: Intra_R_Add_Endocyclic
tested:
rxn: NCO(66) <=> O1[C]=N1(126) origin: Intra_R_Add_Endocyclic

k(1bar) 300K 400K 500K 600K 800K 1000K 1500K 2000K
k(T): -49.54 -33.65 -24.16 -17.85 -10.01 -5.35 0.80 3.82
k(T): -66.25 -46.19 -34.19 -26.21 -16.28 -10.36 -2.54 1.31

kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(6.95187e+18,'s^-1'), n=-1.628, Ea=(88.327,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Backbone0_N-2R!H-inRing_N-1R!H-inRing_Sp-2R!H-1R!H""")
kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(6.95187e+18,'s^-1'), n=-1.628, Ea=(111.271,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Backbone0_N-2R!H-inRing_N-1R!H-inRing_Sp-2R!H-1R!H""")
Identical kinetics comments:
kinetics: Estimated from node Backbone0_N-2R!H-inRing_N-1R!H-inRing_Sp-2R!H-1R!H

Observables Test Case: NC Comparison

✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.200 on average between old model and new model in all conditions!

nitrogen Passed Observable Testing ✅

Regression test oxidation:

Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:02:21
Current: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:01:46
Reference: Memory used: 2771.24 MB
Current: Memory used: 2740.65 MB

oxidation Passed Core Comparison ✅

Original model has 59 species.
Test model has 59 species. ✅
Original model has 694 reactions.
Test model has 694 reactions. ✅

oxidation Passed Edge Comparison ✅

Original model has 230 species.
Test model has 230 species. ✅
Original model has 1526 reactions.
Test model has 1526 reactions. ✅

Observables Test Case: Oxidation Comparison

✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.500 on average between old model and new model in all conditions!

oxidation Passed Observable Testing ✅

Regression test sulfur:

Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:00:54
Current: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:00:49
Reference: Memory used: 2872.34 MB
Current: Memory used: 2855.39 MB

sulfur Passed Core Comparison ✅

Original model has 27 species.
Test model has 27 species. ✅
Original model has 74 reactions.
Test model has 74 reactions. ✅

sulfur Failed Edge Comparison ❌

Original model has 89 species.
Test model has 89 species. ✅
Original model has 227 reactions.
Test model has 227 reactions. ✅
The original model has 1 reactions that the tested model does not have. ❌
rxn: O(4) + SO2(15) (+N2) <=> SO3(16) (+N2) origin: primarySulfurLibrary
The tested model has 1 reactions that the original model does not have. ❌
rxn: O(4) + SO2(15) (+N2) <=> SO3(16) (+N2) origin: primarySulfurLibrary

Observables Test Case: SO2 Comparison

✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.100 on average between old model and new model in all conditions!

sulfur Passed Observable Testing ✅

Regression test superminimal:

Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:00:35
Current: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:00:32
Reference: Memory used: 2953.67 MB
Current: Memory used: 2972.05 MB

superminimal Passed Core Comparison ✅

Original model has 13 species.
Test model has 13 species. ✅
Original model has 21 reactions.
Test model has 21 reactions. ✅

superminimal Passed Edge Comparison ✅

Original model has 18 species.
Test model has 18 species. ✅
Original model has 28 reactions.
Test model has 28 reactions. ✅

Regression test RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_superminimal:

Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:02:23
Current: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:02:21
Reference: Memory used: 3450.99 MB
Current: Memory used: 3429.02 MB

RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_superminimal Passed Core Comparison ✅

Original model has 13 species.
Test model has 13 species. ✅
Original model has 19 reactions.
Test model has 19 reactions. ✅

RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_superminimal Passed Edge Comparison ✅

Original model has 13 species.
Test model has 13 species. ✅
Original model has 19 reactions.
Test model has 19 reactions. ✅

Observables Test Case: RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_superminimal Comparison

✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.100 on average between old model and new model in all conditions!

RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_superminimal Passed Observable Testing ✅

Regression test RMS_CSTR_liquid_oxidation:

Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:05:54
Current: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:05:53
Reference: Memory used: 3368.83 MB
Current: Memory used: 3368.40 MB

RMS_CSTR_liquid_oxidation Passed Core Comparison ✅

Original model has 37 species.
Test model has 37 species. ✅
Original model has 233 reactions.
Test model has 233 reactions. ✅

RMS_CSTR_liquid_oxidation Failed Edge Comparison ❌

Original model has 206 species.
Test model has 206 species. ✅
Original model has 1508 reactions.
Test model has 1508 reactions. ✅
The original model has 1 reactions that the tested model does not have. ❌
rxn: CCCO[O](36) <=> CC[CH]OO(51) origin: intra_H_migration
The tested model has 1 reactions that the original model does not have. ❌
rxn: CCCO[O](35) <=> [OH](21) + CCC=O(44) origin: intra_H_migration

Non-identical kinetics! ❌
original:
rxn: CCCO[O](36) + CCCC(C)O[O](33) <=> oxygen(1) + CCC[O](97) + CCCC(C)[O](64) origin: Peroxyl_Disproportionation
tested:
rxn: CCCO[O](35) + CCCC(C)O[O](33) <=> oxygen(1) + CCC[O](95) + CCCC(C)[O](65) origin: Peroxyl_Disproportionation

k(1bar) 300K 400K 500K 600K 800K 1000K 1500K 2000K
k(T): 3.69 4.39 4.82 5.10 5.45 5.66 5.94 6.08
k(T): 7.83 7.49 7.23 7.02 6.68 6.42 5.95 5.61

kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(3.2e+12,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=0, Ea=(3.866,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-5R-R_7R!H->C_N-7C-inRing_Ext-5R-R""")
kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(3.18266e+20,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=-2.694, Ea=(0,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-5R-R_7R!H->C_N-7C-inRing""")
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-5R-R_7R!H->C_N-7C-inRing_Ext-5R-R
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-5R-R_7R!H->C_N-7C-inRing

Observables Test Case: RMS_CSTR_liquid_oxidation Comparison

✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.100 on average between old model and new model in all conditions!

RMS_CSTR_liquid_oxidation Passed Observable Testing ✅

Regression test fragment:

Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:00:40
Current: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:00:37
Reference: Memory used: 2702.63 MB
Current: Memory used: 2687.50 MB

fragment Passed Core Comparison ✅

Original model has 10 species.
Test model has 10 species. ✅
Original model has 2 reactions.
Test model has 2 reactions. ✅

fragment Passed Edge Comparison ✅

Original model has 33 species.
Test model has 33 species. ✅
Original model has 47 reactions.
Test model has 47 reactions. ✅

Observables Test Case: fragment Comparison

✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.100 on average between old model and new model in all conditions!

fragment Passed Observable Testing ✅

Regression test RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_fragment:

Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:03:01
Current: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:02:59
Reference: Memory used: 3592.03 MB
Current: Memory used: 3601.90 MB

RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_fragment Passed Core Comparison ✅

Original model has 10 species.
Test model has 10 species. ✅
Original model has 2 reactions.
Test model has 2 reactions. ✅

RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_fragment Passed Edge Comparison ✅

Original model has 27 species.
Test model has 27 species. ✅
Original model has 24 reactions.
Test model has 24 reactions. ✅

Observables Test Case: RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_fragment Comparison

✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.100 on average between old model and new model in all conditions!

RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_fragment Passed Observable Testing ✅

beep boop this comment was written by a bot 🤖

@JacksonBurns
update runner conda version on setup
7b2ced5 
trying to solve macos hang problem
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

Regression Testing Results

WARNING:root:Initial mole fractions do not sum to one; normalizing.
WARNING:root:Initial mole fractions do not sum to one; normalizing.
WARNING:root:Initial mole fractions do not sum to one; normalizing.
⚠️ One or more regression tests failed.
Please download the failed results and run the tests locally or check the log to see why.

Detailed regression test results.

Regression test aromatics:

Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:01:05
Current: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:01:04
Reference: Memory used: 2778.04 MB
Current: Memory used: 2755.31 MB

aromatics Passed Core Comparison ✅

Original model has 15 species.
Test model has 15 species. ✅
Original model has 11 reactions.
Test model has 11 reactions. ✅

aromatics Failed Edge Comparison ❌

Original model has 106 species.
Test model has 106 species. ✅
Original model has 358 reactions.
Test model has 358 reactions. ✅

Non-identical thermo! ❌
original: C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2
tested: C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2

Hf(300K) S(300K) Cp(300K) Cp(400K) Cp(500K) Cp(600K) Cp(800K) Cp(1000K) Cp(1500K)
164.90 80.93 22.21 28.97 35.25 40.69 48.70 53.97 64.36
129.39 79.85 22.98 30.09 36.61 42.21 50.22 55.39 65.95

thermo: Thermo group additivity estimation: group(Cs-(Cds-Cds)(Cds-Cds)(Cds-Cds)H) + group(Cds-Cds(Cds-Cds)(Cds-Cds)) + group(Cds-CdsCsH) + group(Cds-CdsCsH) + group(Cds-Cds(Cds-Cds)H) + group(Cds-Cds(Cds-Cds)H) + group(Cds-CdsCsH) + group(Cdd-CdsCds) + Estimated bicyclic component: polycyclic(s4_6_6_ane) - ring(Cyclohexane) - ring(Cyclohexane) + ring(124cyclohexatriene) + ring(124cyclohexatriene)
thermo: Thermo group additivity estimation: group(Cs-(Cds-Cds)(Cds-Cds)(Cds-Cds)H) + group(Cds-Cds(Cds-Cds)(Cds-Cds)) + group(Cds-CdsCsH) + group(Cds-CdsCsH) + group(Cds-Cds(Cds-Cds)H) + group(Cds-Cds(Cds-Cds)H) + group(Cds-CdsCsH) + group(Cdd-CdsCds) + Estimated bicyclic component: polycyclic(s4_6_6_ane) - ring(Cyclohexane) - ring(Cyclohexane) + ring(124cyclohexatriene) + ring(1,4-Cyclohexadiene)

Non-identical kinetics! ❌
original:
rxn: [c]1ccccc1(3) + C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) <=> benzene(1) + C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) origin: Disproportionation
tested:
rxn: [c]1ccccc1(3) + C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) <=> benzene(1) + C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) origin: Disproportionation

k(1bar) 300K 400K 500K 600K 800K 1000K 1500K 2000K
k(T): -3.00 -0.74 0.70 1.71 3.07 3.97 5.33 6.15
k(T): 4.24 4.69 5.05 5.33 5.79 6.14 6.78 7.23

kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(17.1699,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=3.635, Ea=(9.943,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0 Ea raised from 38.5 to 41.6 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.""")
kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(17.1699,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=3.635, Ea=(0,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0""")
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0
Ea raised from 38.5 to 41.6 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0

Non-identical kinetics! ❌
original:
rxn: [H](4) + C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) <=> [H][H](11) + C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) origin: Disproportionation
tested:
rxn: [H](4) + C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) <=> [H][H](11) + C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) origin: Disproportionation

k(1bar) 300K 400K 500K 600K 800K 1000K 1500K 2000K
k(T): -7.44 -4.08 -2.05 -0.69 1.02 2.06 3.46 4.18
k(T): 5.77 5.83 5.88 5.92 5.97 6.02 6.10 6.16

kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(4.06926e+10,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=0.47, Ea=(18.137,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0 Ea raised from 75.2 to 75.9 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.""")
kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(4.06926e+10,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=0.47, Ea=(0,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0""")
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0
Ea raised from 75.2 to 75.9 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0

Non-identical kinetics! ❌
original:
rxn: [CH]=C(7) + C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) <=> C=C(13) + C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) origin: Disproportionation
tested:
rxn: [CH]=C(7) + C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) <=> C=C(13) + C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) origin: Disproportionation

k(1bar) 300K 400K 500K 600K 800K 1000K 1500K 2000K
k(T): -7.17 -3.66 -1.56 -0.16 1.60 2.65 4.05 4.75
k(T): 4.06 4.76 5.18 5.46 5.81 6.02 6.30 6.44

kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(7.23e+12,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=0, Ea=(19.262,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_N-Sp-6R!H-4CHNS Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0""")
kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(7.23e+12,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=0, Ea=(3.841,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_N-Sp-6R!H-4CHNS Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0""")
Identical kinetics comments:
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_N-Sp-6R!H-4CHNS
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0

Non-identical kinetics! ❌
original:
rxn: [CH]1C2=CC=CC12(8) + C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) <=> C1=CC2CC2=C1(27) + C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) origin: Disproportionation
tested:
rxn: [CH]1C2=CC=CC12(8) + C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) <=> C1=CC2CC2=C1(27) + C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) origin: Disproportionation

k(1bar) 300K 400K 500K 600K 800K 1000K 1500K 2000K
k(T): -30.48 -21.35 -15.79 -12.03 -7.23 -4.28 -0.16 2.03
k(T): -4.55 -1.90 -0.23 0.94 2.49 3.50 5.02 5.92

kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(17.1699,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=3.635, Ea=(47.659,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0 Ea raised from 195.4 to 199.4 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.""")
kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(17.1699,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=3.635, Ea=(12.063,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0 Ea raised from 46.8 to 50.5 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.""")
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0
Ea raised from 195.4 to 199.4 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0
Ea raised from 46.8 to 50.5 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.

Non-identical kinetics! ❌
original:
rxn: [CH]1C2=CC=CC12(8) + C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) <=> C1=CC2C=C2C1(29) + C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) origin: Disproportionation
tested:
rxn: [CH]1C2=CC=CC12(8) + C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) <=> C1=CC2C=C2C1(29) + C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) origin: Disproportionation

k(1bar) 300K 400K 500K 600K 800K 1000K 1500K 2000K
k(T): -31.23 -21.91 -16.23 -12.40 -7.51 -4.50 -0.31 1.91
k(T): -5.30 -2.46 -0.68 0.57 2.21 3.28 4.87 5.80

kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(17.1699,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=3.635, Ea=(48.686,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0 Ea raised from 202.2 to 203.7 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.""")
kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(17.1699,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=3.635, Ea=(13.089,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0 Ea raised from 53.5 to 54.8 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.""")
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0
Ea raised from 202.2 to 203.7 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0
Ea raised from 53.5 to 54.8 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.

Non-identical kinetics! ❌
original:
rxn: [CH]1C2=CC=CC12(8) + C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) <=> C1=CC2=CC2C1(28) + C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) origin: Disproportionation
tested:
rxn: [CH]1C2=CC=CC12(8) + C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) <=> C1=CC2=CC2C1(28) + C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) origin: Disproportionation

k(1bar) 300K 400K 500K 600K 800K 1000K 1500K 2000K
k(T): -27.24 -18.91 -13.84 -10.40 -6.02 -3.30 0.48 2.51
k(T): -1.38 0.48 1.67 2.52 3.68 4.45 5.66 6.39

kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(17.1699,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=3.635, Ea=(43.208,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0 Ea raised from 180.2 to 180.8 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.""")
kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(17.1699,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=3.635, Ea=(7.718,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0""")
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0
Ea raised from 180.2 to 180.8 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0

Non-identical kinetics! ❌
original:
rxn: [CH]=CC=C(15) + C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) <=> C=CC=C(17) + C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) origin: Disproportionation
tested:
rxn: [CH]=CC=C(15) + C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) <=> C=CC=C(17) + C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) origin: Disproportionation

k(1bar) 300K 400K 500K 600K 800K 1000K 1500K 2000K
k(T): -11.95 -7.61 -5.01 -3.27 -1.10 0.20 1.93 2.80
k(T): -0.49 0.99 1.87 2.46 3.19 3.64 4.23 4.52

kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(2.529e+11,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=0, Ea=(23.821,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-6R!H-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0""")
kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(2.529e+11,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=0, Ea=(8.084,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-6R!H-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0""")
Identical kinetics comments:
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-6R!H-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0

Non-identical kinetics! ❌
original:
rxn: C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) + [CH]=Cc1ccccc1(12) <=> C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) + C=Cc1ccccc1(16) origin: Disproportionation
tested:
rxn: C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) + [CH]=Cc1ccccc1(12) <=> C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) + C=Cc1ccccc1(16) origin: Disproportionation

k(1bar) 300K 400K 500K 600K 800K 1000K 1500K 2000K
k(T): -12.28 -7.86 -5.21 -3.44 -1.23 0.10 1.87 2.75
k(T): -0.66 0.85 1.76 2.37 3.13 3.58 4.19 4.49

kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(2.529e+11,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=0, Ea=(24.273,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-6R!H-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0""")
kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(2.529e+11,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=0, Ea=(8.328,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-6R!H-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0""")
Identical kinetics comments:
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-6R!H-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0

Non-identical kinetics! ❌
original:
rxn: C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) + [CH]1C2=CC=CC1C=C2(48) <=> C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) + C1=CC2C=CC(=C1)C2(69) origin: Disproportionation
tested:
rxn: C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) + [CH]1C2=CC=CC1C=C2(48) <=> C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) + C1=CC2C=CC(=C1)C2(69) origin: Disproportionation

k(1bar) 300K 400K 500K 600K 800K 1000K 1500K 2000K
k(T): -30.44 -21.32 -15.76 -12.01 -7.22 -4.26 -0.16 2.03
k(T): -4.51 -1.87 -0.20 0.96 2.51 3.52 5.03 5.92

kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(17.1699,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=3.635, Ea=(47.606,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0 Ea raised from 195.1 to 199.2 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.""")
kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(17.1699,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=3.635, Ea=(12.01,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0 Ea raised from 46.5 to 50.2 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.""")
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0
Ea raised from 195.1 to 199.2 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0
Ea raised from 46.5 to 50.2 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.

Non-identical kinetics! ❌
original:
rxn: C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) + [CH]1C2=CC=CC1C=C2(48) <=> C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) + C1=CC2C=CC(=C2)C1(70) origin: Disproportionation
tested:
rxn: C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) + [CH]1C2=CC=CC1C=C2(48) <=> C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) + C1=CC2C=CC(=C2)C1(70) origin: Disproportionation

k(1bar) 300K 400K 500K 600K 800K 1000K 1500K 2000K
k(T): -32.11 -22.57 -16.76 -12.84 -7.84 -4.76 -0.49 1.78
k(T): -6.18 -3.12 -1.20 0.13 1.88 3.01 4.70 5.67

kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(17.1699,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=3.635, Ea=(49.895,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0 Ea raised from 205.2 to 208.8 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.""")
kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(17.1699,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=3.635, Ea=(14.299,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0 Ea raised from 56.6 to 59.8 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.""")
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0
Ea raised from 205.2 to 208.8 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0
Ea raised from 56.6 to 59.8 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.

Non-identical kinetics! ❌
original:
rxn: C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) + [CH]1C2=CC=CC1C=C2(48) <=> C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) + C1=CC2=CC(C=C2)C1(71) origin: Disproportionation
tested:
rxn: C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) + [CH]1C2=CC=CC1C=C2(48) <=> C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) + C1=CC2=CC(C=C2)C1(71) origin: Disproportionation

k(1bar) 300K 400K 500K 600K 800K 1000K 1500K 2000K
k(T): -33.97 -23.97 -17.88 -13.77 -8.54 -5.32 -0.86 1.50
k(T): -8.04 -4.52 -2.32 -0.81 1.18 2.46 4.32 5.39

kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(17.1699,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=3.635, Ea=(52.457,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0 Ea raised from 214.4 to 219.5 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.""")
kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(17.1699,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=3.635, Ea=(16.86,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0 Ea raised from 65.8 to 70.5 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.""")
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0
Ea raised from 214.4 to 219.5 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0
Ea raised from 65.8 to 70.5 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.

Non-identical kinetics! ❌
original:
rxn: C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) + C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) <=> C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) + C1=CC2C=CC1C=C2(82) origin: Disproportionation
tested:
rxn: C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) + C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) <=> C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) + C1=CC2C=CC1C=C2(82) origin: Disproportionation

k(1bar) 300K 400K 500K 600K 800K 1000K 1500K 2000K
k(T): -30.48 -21.35 -15.79 -12.03 -7.23 -4.28 -0.16 2.03
k(T): -4.55 -1.90 -0.23 0.94 2.49 3.50 5.02 5.92

kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(17.1699,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=3.635, Ea=(47.659,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0 Ea raised from 195.4 to 199.4 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.""")
kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(17.1699,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=3.635, Ea=(12.063,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0 Ea raised from 46.8 to 50.5 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.""")
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0
Ea raised from 195.4 to 199.4 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 3.0
Ea raised from 46.8 to 50.5 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.

Non-identical kinetics! ❌
original:
rxn: C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) + C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) <=> C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) + C1=CC2C=CC1=CC2(83) origin: Disproportionation
tested:
rxn: C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) + C1=CC2C=C[C]1C=C2(49) <=> C1=CC2C=CC=1C=C2(79) + C1=CC2C=CC1=CC2(83) origin: Disproportionation

k(1bar) 300K 400K 500K 600K 800K 1000K 1500K 2000K
k(T): -19.49 -12.98 -9.00 -6.29 -2.81 -0.64 2.42 4.08
k(T): 3.96 4.60 5.07 5.43 5.98 6.39 7.11 7.60

kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(51.5097,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=3.635, Ea=(33.226,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 9.0 Ea raised from 133.4 to 139.0 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.""")
kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(51.5097,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=3.635, Ea=(1.036,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 9.0""")
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 9.0
Ea raised from 133.4 to 139.0 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-1R!H-R_N-4R->O_Sp-5R!H=1R!H_Ext-4CHNS-R_Ext-4CHNS-R
Multiplied by reaction path degeneracy 9.0

Observables Test Case: Aromatics Comparison

✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.500 on average between old model and new model in all conditions!

aromatics Passed Observable Testing ✅

Regression test liquid_oxidation:

Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:02:09
Current: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:02:06
Reference: Memory used: 2908.24 MB
Current: Memory used: 2862.61 MB

liquid_oxidation Failed Core Comparison ❌

Original model has 37 species.
Test model has 37 species. ✅
Original model has 216 reactions.
Test model has 215 reactions. ❌
The original model has 1 reactions that the tested model does not have. ❌
rxn: CCO[O](29) <=> [OH](22) + CC=O(69) origin: intra_H_migration

Non-identical kinetics! ❌
original:
rxn: CCCC(C)O[O](20) + CCCCCO[O](104) <=> oxygen(1) + CCCC(C)[O](64) + CCCCC[O](128) origin: Peroxyl_Disproportionation
tested:
rxn: CCCC(C)O[O](20) + CCCCCO[O](103) <=> oxygen(1) + CCCC(C)[O](61) + CCCCC[O](127) origin: Peroxyl_Disproportionation

k(1bar) 300K 400K 500K 600K 800K 1000K 1500K 2000K
k(T): 3.77 4.45 4.86 5.14 5.48 5.68 5.96 6.09
k(T): 7.83 7.49 7.23 7.02 6.68 6.42 5.95 5.61

kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(3.2e+12,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=0, Ea=(3.756,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-5R-R_7R!H->C_N-7C-inRing_Ext-5R-R""")
kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(3.18266e+20,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=-2.694, Ea=(0,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-5R-R_7R!H->C_N-7C-inRing""")
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-5R-R_7R!H->C_N-7C-inRing_Ext-5R-R
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-5R-R_7R!H->C_N-7C-inRing

liquid_oxidation Failed Edge Comparison ❌

Original model has 202 species.
Test model has 202 species. ✅
Original model has 1610 reactions.
Test model has 1618 reactions. ❌
The original model has 2 reactions that the tested model does not have. ❌
rxn: CCO[O](29) <=> [OH](22) + CC=O(69) origin: intra_H_migration
rxn: CCCCCO[O](104) + CCCCCO[O](104) <=> oxygen(1) + CCCCC=O(120) + CCCCCO(130) origin: Peroxyl_Termination
The tested model has 10 reactions that the original model does not have. ❌
rxn: CCO[O](29) <=> C[CH]OO(70) origin: intra_H_migration
rxn: [CH2]CCOO(77) + CCCCCOO(105) <=> CCCOO(36) + CC[CH]CCOO(108) origin: H_Abstraction
rxn: [CH2]CCOO(77) + CCCCCOO(105) <=> CCCOO(36) + CCC[CH]COO(107) origin: H_Abstraction
rxn: [CH2]CCOO(77) + CCCCCOO(105) <=> CCCOO(36) + C[CH]CCCOO(109) origin: H_Abstraction
rxn: [CH2]CCOO(77) + CCCCCOO(105) <=> CCCOO(36) + CCCC[CH]OO(134) origin: H_Abstraction
rxn: CCCOO(36) + [CH2]CCCCOO(110) <=> [CH2]CCOO(77) + CCCCCOO(105) origin: H_Abstraction
rxn: C[CH]CCCO(157) + CCCCCO[O](103) <=> CC=CCCO(183) + CCCCCOO(105) origin: Disproportionation
rxn: C[CH]CCCO(157) + CCCCCO[O](103) <=> C=CCCCO(184) + CCCCCOO(105) origin: Disproportionation
rxn: C[CH]CCCO(157) + C[CH]CCCO(157) <=> CC=CCCO(183) + CCCCCO(130) origin: Disproportionation
rxn: C[CH]CCCO(157) + C[CH]CCCO(157) <=> C=CCCCO(184) + CCCCCO(130) origin: Disproportionation

Non-identical kinetics! ❌
original:
rxn: CCCC(C)O[O](20) + CCCCCO[O](104) <=> oxygen(1) + CCCC(C)[O](64) + CCCCC[O](128) origin: Peroxyl_Disproportionation
tested:
rxn: CCCC(C)O[O](20) + CCCCCO[O](103) <=> oxygen(1) + CCCC(C)[O](61) + CCCCC[O](127) origin: Peroxyl_Disproportionation

k(1bar) 300K 400K 500K 600K 800K 1000K 1500K 2000K
k(T): 3.77 4.45 4.86 5.14 5.48 5.68 5.96 6.09
k(T): 7.83 7.49 7.23 7.02 6.68 6.42 5.95 5.61

kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(3.2e+12,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=0, Ea=(3.756,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-5R-R_7R!H->C_N-7C-inRing_Ext-5R-R""")
kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(3.18266e+20,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=-2.694, Ea=(0,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-5R-R_7R!H->C_N-7C-inRing""")
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-5R-R_7R!H->C_N-7C-inRing_Ext-5R-R
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-5R-R_7R!H->C_N-7C-inRing

Non-identical kinetics! ❌
original:
rxn: CCCCCO[O](104) + CC(CC(C)OO)O[O](103) <=> oxygen(1) + CCCCC[O](128) + CC([O])CC(C)OO(127) origin: Peroxyl_Disproportionation
tested:
rxn: CCCCCO[O](103) + CC(CC(C)OO)O[O](104) <=> oxygen(1) + CCCCC[O](127) + CC([O])CC(C)OO(129) origin: Peroxyl_Disproportionation

k(1bar) 300K 400K 500K 600K 800K 1000K 1500K 2000K
k(T): 3.52 4.27 4.71 5.01 5.39 5.61 5.91 6.06
k(T): 7.79 7.46 7.21 7.00 6.67 6.41 5.94 5.60

kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(3.2e+12,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=0, Ea=(4.096,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-5R-R_7R!H->C_N-7C-inRing_Ext-5R-R""")
kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(3.18266e+20,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=-2.694, Ea=(0.053,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-5R-R_7R!H->C_N-7C-inRing Ea raised from 0.0 to 0.2 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.""")
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-5R-R_7R!H->C_N-7C-inRing_Ext-5R-R
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-5R-R_7R!H->C_N-7C-inRing
Ea raised from 0.0 to 0.2 kJ/mol to match endothermicity of reaction.

Observables Test Case: liquid_oxidation Comparison

✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.100 on average between old model and new model in all conditions!

liquid_oxidation Passed Observable Testing ✅

Regression test nitrogen:

Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:01:21
Current: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:01:12
Reference: Memory used: 2903.87 MB
Current: Memory used: 2867.71 MB

nitrogen Passed Core Comparison ✅

Original model has 41 species.
Test model has 41 species. ✅
Original model has 360 reactions.
Test model has 360 reactions. ✅

nitrogen Passed Edge Comparison ✅

Original model has 132 species.
Test model has 132 species. ✅
Original model has 997 reactions.
Test model has 997 reactions. ✅

Observables Test Case: NC Comparison

✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.200 on average between old model and new model in all conditions!

nitrogen Passed Observable Testing ✅

Regression test oxidation:

Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:02:23
Current: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:01:47
Reference: Memory used: 2767.82 MB
Current: Memory used: 2736.42 MB

oxidation Passed Core Comparison ✅

Original model has 59 species.
Test model has 59 species. ✅
Original model has 694 reactions.
Test model has 694 reactions. ✅

oxidation Passed Edge Comparison ✅

Original model has 230 species.
Test model has 230 species. ✅
Original model has 1526 reactions.
Test model has 1526 reactions. ✅

Observables Test Case: Oxidation Comparison

✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.500 on average between old model and new model in all conditions!

oxidation Passed Observable Testing ✅

Regression test sulfur:

Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:00:54
Current: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:00:49
Reference: Memory used: 2874.02 MB
Current: Memory used: 2859.02 MB

sulfur Passed Core Comparison ✅

Original model has 27 species.
Test model has 27 species. ✅
Original model has 74 reactions.
Test model has 74 reactions. ✅

sulfur Failed Edge Comparison ❌

Original model has 89 species.
Test model has 89 species. ✅
Original model has 227 reactions.
Test model has 227 reactions. ✅
The original model has 1 reactions that the tested model does not have. ❌
rxn: O(4) + SO2(15) (+N2) <=> SO3(16) (+N2) origin: primarySulfurLibrary
The tested model has 1 reactions that the original model does not have. ❌
rxn: O(4) + SO2(15) (+N2) <=> SO3(16) (+N2) origin: primarySulfurLibrary

Observables Test Case: SO2 Comparison

✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.100 on average between old model and new model in all conditions!

sulfur Passed Observable Testing ✅

Regression test superminimal:

Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:00:35
Current: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:00:32
Reference: Memory used: 2989.69 MB
Current: Memory used: 2984.42 MB

superminimal Passed Core Comparison ✅

Original model has 13 species.
Test model has 13 species. ✅
Original model has 21 reactions.
Test model has 21 reactions. ✅

superminimal Passed Edge Comparison ✅

Original model has 18 species.
Test model has 18 species. ✅
Original model has 28 reactions.
Test model has 28 reactions. ✅

Regression test RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_superminimal:

Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:02:23
Current: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:02:21
Reference: Memory used: 3438.90 MB
Current: Memory used: 3455.33 MB

RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_superminimal Passed Core Comparison ✅

Original model has 13 species.
Test model has 13 species. ✅
Original model has 19 reactions.
Test model has 19 reactions. ✅

RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_superminimal Passed Edge Comparison ✅

Original model has 13 species.
Test model has 13 species. ✅
Original model has 19 reactions.
Test model has 19 reactions. ✅

Observables Test Case: RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_superminimal Comparison

✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.100 on average between old model and new model in all conditions!

RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_superminimal Passed Observable Testing ✅

Regression test RMS_CSTR_liquid_oxidation:

Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:05:54
Current: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:05:52
Reference: Memory used: 3369.77 MB
Current: Memory used: 3363.96 MB

RMS_CSTR_liquid_oxidation Failed Core Comparison ❌

Original model has 37 species.
Test model has 37 species. ✅
Original model has 233 reactions.
Test model has 232 reactions. ❌
The original model has 1 reactions that the tested model does not have. ❌
rxn: CCO[O](34) <=> [OH](21) + CC=O(62) origin: intra_H_migration

RMS_CSTR_liquid_oxidation Failed Edge Comparison ❌

Original model has 206 species.
Test model has 206 species. ✅
Original model has 1508 reactions.
Test model has 1508 reactions. ✅
The original model has 2 reactions that the tested model does not have. ❌
rxn: CCO[O](34) <=> [OH](21) + CC=O(62) origin: intra_H_migration
rxn: CCCO[O](35) <=> [OH](21) + CCC=O(44) origin: intra_H_migration
The tested model has 2 reactions that the original model does not have. ❌
rxn: CCCO[O](37) <=> CC[CH]OO(48) origin: intra_H_migration
rxn: CCO[O](36) <=> C[CH]OO(58) origin: intra_H_migration

Non-identical kinetics! ❌
original:
rxn: CCCO[O](35) + CCCC(C)O[O](33) <=> oxygen(1) + CCC[O](95) + CCCC(C)[O](65) origin: Peroxyl_Disproportionation
tested:
rxn: CCCO[O](37) + CCCC(C)O[O](21) <=> oxygen(1) + CCC[O](93) + CCCC(C)[O](57) origin: Peroxyl_Disproportionation

k(1bar) 300K 400K 500K 600K 800K 1000K 1500K 2000K
k(T): 7.83 7.49 7.23 7.02 6.68 6.42 5.95 5.61
k(T): 3.69 4.39 4.82 5.10 5.45 5.66 5.94 6.08

kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(3.18266e+20,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=-2.694, Ea=(0,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-5R-R_7R!H->C_N-7C-inRing""")
kinetics: Arrhenius(A=(3.2e+12,'cm^3/(mol*s)'), n=0, Ea=(3.866,'kcal/mol'), T0=(1,'K'), comment="""Estimated from node Root_Ext-5R-R_7R!H->C_N-7C-inRing_Ext-5R-R""")
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-5R-R_7R!H->C_N-7C-inRing
kinetics: Estimated from node Root_Ext-5R-R_7R!H->C_N-7C-inRing_Ext-5R-R

Observables Test Case: RMS_CSTR_liquid_oxidation Comparison

✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.100 on average between old model and new model in all conditions!

RMS_CSTR_liquid_oxidation Passed Observable Testing ✅

Regression test fragment:

Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:00:40
Current: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:00:38
Reference: Memory used: 2710.86 MB
Current: Memory used: 2693.34 MB

fragment Passed Core Comparison ✅

Original model has 10 species.
Test model has 10 species. ✅
Original model has 2 reactions.
Test model has 2 reactions. ✅

fragment Passed Edge Comparison ✅

Original model has 33 species.
Test model has 33 species. ✅
Original model has 47 reactions.
Test model has 47 reactions. ✅

Observables Test Case: fragment Comparison

✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.100 on average between old model and new model in all conditions!

fragment Passed Observable Testing ✅

Regression test RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_fragment:

Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:03:03
Current: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:03:00
Reference: Memory used: 3594.99 MB
Current: Memory used: 3617.23 MB

RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_fragment Passed Core Comparison ✅

Original model has 10 species.
Test model has 10 species. ✅
Original model has 2 reactions.
Test model has 2 reactions. ✅

RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_fragment Passed Edge Comparison ✅

Original model has 27 species.
Test model has 27 species. ✅
Original model has 24 reactions.
Test model has 24 reactions. ✅

Observables Test Case: RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_fragment Comparison

✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.100 on average between old model and new model in all conditions!

RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_fragment Passed Observable Testing ✅

beep boop this comment was written by a bot 🤖

@JacksonBurns JacksonBurns mentioned this pull request Jun 19, 2024
Open
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

This pull request is being automatically marked as stale because it has not received any interaction in the last 90 days. Please leave a comment if this is still a relevant pull request, otherwise it will automatically be closed in 30 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale stale issue/PR as determined by actions bot label Sep 12, 2024
@JacksonBurns
Copy link
Contributor Author

ongoing

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale stale issue/PR as determined by actions bot label Sep 15, 2024
@JacksonBurns JacksonBurns mentioned this pull request Nov 22, 2024
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@rwest rwest Awaiting requested review from rwest

@mjohnson541 mjohnson541 Awaiting requested review from mjohnson541

@hwpang hwpang Awaiting requested review from hwpang

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

@JacksonBurns JacksonBurns

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@JacksonBurns @rwest