Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate outlier in GPU memory usage with 2.6 (train): Hermit + cvf_diet_responset2t #9516

Closed
6 tasks
Tracked by #7619
koernerfelicia opened this issue Sep 2, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed
6 tasks
Tracked by #7619
Labels
type:enhancement ✨ Additions of new features or changes to existing ones, should be doable in a single PR

Comments

@koernerfelicia
Copy link
Contributor

koernerfelicia commented Sep 2, 2021

Followup to #9433

As seen [here| https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/14rIvQLxEdp1PJDqhM65n0__THKhvS5f4XPLoWz8SWSs/edit#gid=1230100797], there is a huge increase to GPU memory usage for train on Hermit with cvf_diet_responset2t. This is an outlier, and should be investigated.

Definition of Done (not necessarily in this order)

Depending on what we learn from investigation create the appropriate issue:

  • issue to address the problem OR issue to investigate further OR issue on TF repository
@koernerfelicia koernerfelicia mentioned this issue Sep 2, 2021
19 tasks
@koernerfelicia koernerfelicia changed the title Investigate outlier in GPU memory usage (train): Hermit + cvf_diet_responset2t Investigate outlier in GPU memory usage (train): Hermit + cvf_diet_responset2t Sep 2, 2021
@koernerfelicia koernerfelicia changed the title Investigate outlier in GPU memory usage (train): Hermit + cvf_diet_responset2t Investigate outlier in GPU memory usage with 2.6 (train): Hermit + cvf_diet_responset2t Oct 1, 2021
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jan 8, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Jan 8, 2022
@markus-hinsche markus-hinsche self-assigned this Feb 23, 2022
@stale stale bot removed the stale label Feb 23, 2022
@markus-hinsche markus-hinsche removed their assignment Mar 24, 2022
@m-vdb m-vdb added the type:enhancement ✨ Additions of new features or changes to existing ones, should be doable in a single PR label Oct 10, 2022
@sync-by-unito
Copy link

sync-by-unito bot commented Dec 19, 2022

➤ Maxime Verger commented:

💡 Heads up! We're moving issues to Jira: https://rasa-open-source.atlassian.net/browse/OSS.

From now on, this Jira board is the place where you can browse (without an account) and create issues (you'll need a free Jira account for that). This GitHub issue has already been migrated to Jira and will be closed on January 9th, 2023. Do not forget to subscribe to the corresponding Jira issue!

➡️ More information in the forum: https://forum.rasa.com/t/migration-of-rasa-oss-issues-to-jira/56569.

@m-vdb m-vdb closed this as completed Jan 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type:enhancement ✨ Additions of new features or changes to existing ones, should be doable in a single PR
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants