Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(source): implement near client, data source, core worker and LiNEAR worker #524

Merged
merged 33 commits into from
Sep 13, 2024

Conversation

pseudoyu
Copy link
Member

@pseudoyu pseudoyu commented Sep 5, 2024

Summary

Checklist

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

@pseudoyu pseudoyu self-assigned this Sep 5, 2024
@pseudoyu pseudoyu marked this pull request as ready for review September 6, 2024 09:59
@pseudoyu pseudoyu requested review from brucexc, FrankLi123, kallydev and polebug and removed request for polebug September 6, 2024 10:08
@pseudoyu pseudoyu changed the title feat(source): add near client in provider and implement data source feat(source): implement near client, data source and core worker Sep 6, 2024
@pseudoyu pseudoyu changed the title feat(source): implement near client, data source and core worker feat(source): implement near client, data source, core worker and LiNEAR worker Sep 12, 2024
@pseudoyu pseudoyu changed the base branch from main to worker-dev September 12, 2024 08:07
@pseudoyu pseudoyu merged commit c8705f6 into worker-dev Sep 13, 2024
5 checks passed
@pseudoyu pseudoyu deleted the feat/add-near-source branch September 13, 2024 09:40
kallydev pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2024
…EAR worker (#524)

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: polebug <[email protected]>
fix: missing near source

fix(monitor): init near source network client in monitor (#541)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants