-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CI: update check-labels-action #19101
Conversation
Is that label set / removed automatically? |
That's the idea, I'm trying to add that to the label checker. |
As discussed offline: Let's merge this and test in master. |
3827943
to
f1f6366
Compare
RIOT-OS/check-labels-action#1 is merged. Please rebase and mark ready for review, so we can tentatively merge this (otherwise AFAIK there is no real way to test this) |
f1f6366
to
ec7ab01
Compare
If we merge this and sth goes wrong, the action might never succeed and we need to force merging any fix. |
Which check exactly? |
I mean this one: Line 6 in 6fb340d
|
👍 I was not sure if you meant disable bors altogether, but temporarily disabling the label check is fine for me. Can you piggyback this? |
c94648d
to
74443dd
Compare
74443dd
to
1dabd68
Compare
bors merge |
👎 Rejected by too few approved reviews |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
bors merge
bors merge ... |
bors cancel |
Canceled. |
Build succeeded: |
Contribution description
This PR bumps the check-labels-action to the new version that sets a "Process: missing approvals" label, to be used as bors "block_labels" instead of relying on bors to pick up changes to the check-labels status.
TESTING STILLwaiting for RIOT-OS/check-labels-action#1 to be merged & taggedTesting procedure
Issues/PRs references