Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Stop raising AttributeError when accessing missing calibration #9681

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 28, 2023

Conversation

nkanazawa1989
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

In #9597 we updated the InstructionProperties.calibration to internally store CalibrationEntry subclass. However, there still be the case None is stored instead when user/system doesn't provide any calibration, e.g. reset instruction or any control flow operation. Accessing calibration of such entry raises AttributeError, which must be suppressed and it must return None instead.

Details and comments

@nkanazawa1989 nkanazawa1989 added stable backport potential The bug might be minimal and/or import enough to be port to stable Changelog: Bugfix Include in the "Fixed" section of the changelog labels Feb 28, 2023
@nkanazawa1989 nkanazawa1989 requested a review from a team as a code owner February 28, 2023 17:14
@qiskit-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for opening a new pull request.

Before your PR can be merged it will first need to pass continuous integration tests and be reviewed. Sometimes the review process can be slow, so please be patient.

While you're waiting, please feel free to review other open PRs. While only a subset of people are authorized to approve pull requests for merging, everyone is encouraged to review open pull requests. Doing reviews helps reduce the burden on the core team and helps make the project's code better for everyone.

One or more of the the following people are requested to review this:

  • @Qiskit/terra-core

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Feb 28, 2023

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 4296051502

  • 2 of 2 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.002%) to 85.343%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 4283043370: 0.002%
Covered Lines: 67528
Relevant Lines: 79125

💛 - Coveralls

Copy link
Member

@mtreinish mtreinish left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This LGTM, it seems straightforward enough and is an obvious oversight we both made in #9597 (although I guess I naively assumed nobody would query the calibrations for something that doesn't have one :) ).

@mtreinish mtreinish added this to the 0.23.3 milestone Feb 28, 2023
@mergify mergify bot merged commit 7463342 into Qiskit:main Feb 28, 2023
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2023
Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
(cherry picked from commit 7463342)
mergify bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2023
#9683)

Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
(cherry picked from commit 7463342)

Co-authored-by: Naoki Kanazawa <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ikko Hamamura <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
king-p3nguin pushed a commit to king-p3nguin/qiskit-terra that referenced this pull request May 22, 2023
…t#9681)

Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@nkanazawa1989 nkanazawa1989 deleted the fix/missing_calibration branch December 11, 2023 16:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Changelog: Bugfix Include in the "Fixed" section of the changelog stable backport potential The bug might be minimal and/or import enough to be port to stable
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants