Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix handling of simulator backends in BackendV2Converter (backport #9630) #9632

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 22, 2023

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Feb 22, 2023

This is an automatic backport of pull request #9630 done by Mergify.


Mergify commands and options

More conditions and actions can be found in the documentation.

You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:

  • @Mergifyio refresh will re-evaluate the rules
  • @Mergifyio rebase will rebase this PR on its base branch
  • @Mergifyio update will merge the base branch into this PR
  • @Mergifyio backport <destination> will backport this PR on <destination> branch

Additionally, on Mergify dashboard you can:

  • look at your merge queues
  • generate the Mergify configuration with the config editor.

Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.com

This commit fixes some issues in the BackendV2Converter class around its
usage wrapping BackendV1 based simulators (such as Qiskit Aer with the
current release as of this commit 0.11.x). The BackendV2 converter was
incorrectly handling some edge cases in Target creation with simulators
that have ideal gates. The first issue was that the handling of ideal
gates without any properties was incorrect and could not handle gates
that took > 1 qubit. This has been corrected so the converter will work
as expect. The second issue is the `online_date` field in the
`BackendConfiguration` is optional and may not exist, especially on
simulators which that field never really applies for. With these fixes
the BackendV2Converter can be used to wrap BackendV1 simulators.

Fixes #9562

Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
(cherry picked from commit 789707c)
@mergify mergify bot requested review from a team and jyu00 as code owners February 22, 2023 06:04
@qiskit-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for opening a new pull request.

Before your PR can be merged it will first need to pass continuous integration tests and be reviewed. Sometimes the review process can be slow, so please be patient.

While you're waiting, please feel free to review other open PRs. While only a subset of people are authorized to approve pull requests for merging, everyone is encouraged to review open pull requests. Doing reviews helps reduce the burden on the core team and helps make the project's code better for everyone.

One or more of the the following people are requested to review this:

  • @Qiskit/terra-core

@jakelishman jakelishman added Changelog: Bugfix Include in the "Fixed" section of the changelog automerge labels Feb 22, 2023
@mergify mergify bot merged commit 8c65300 into stable/0.23 Feb 22, 2023
@mergify mergify bot deleted the mergify/bp/stable/0.23/pr-9630 branch February 22, 2023 10:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Changelog: Bugfix Include in the "Fixed" section of the changelog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants