Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Show inheritance in inlined classes in docs #709

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 8, 2024

Conversation

Eric-Arellano
Copy link
Collaborator

This was an oversight. We already show inheritance for dedicated class pages from .. autosummary::, but not inlined classes from .. autodoc::.

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 11729842670

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 100.0%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 11681524280: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 2330
Relevant Lines: 2330

💛 - Coveralls

@garrison garrison added the stable backport potential Suitable to be backported to most recent stable branch by Mergify label Nov 8, 2024
@Eric-Arellano Eric-Arellano merged commit 4ba61b4 into Qiskit:main Nov 8, 2024
11 checks passed
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2024
This was an oversight. We already show inheritance for dedicated class pages from `.. autosummary::`, but not inlined classes from `.. autodoc::`.

(cherry picked from commit 4ba61b4)
garrison pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2024
This was an oversight. We already show inheritance for dedicated class pages from `.. autosummary::`, but not inlined classes from `.. autodoc::`.

(cherry picked from commit 4ba61b4)

Co-authored-by: Eric Arellano <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
stable backport potential Suitable to be backported to most recent stable branch by Mergify
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants