Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[epic] Handle inline classes in API docs #199

Closed
Eric-Arellano opened this issue Oct 18, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

[epic] Handle inline classes in API docs #199

Eric-Arellano opened this issue Oct 18, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
API docs epic 🏔️ infra 🏗️ UI feedback rendering/layout issues with the user interface

Comments

@Eric-Arellano
Copy link
Collaborator

Eric-Arellano commented Oct 18, 2023

https://qiskit.org/documentation/apidoc/qasm2.html#qiskit.qasm2.CustomClassical

Screenshot 2023-10-18 at 1 14 51 PM

It's more clear what is happening in open source:

Screenshot 2023-10-18 at 1 15 04 PM

Tasks

Preview Give feedback
No tasks being tracked yet.
@Eric-Arellano Eric-Arellano added the UI feedback rendering/layout issues with the user interface label Oct 18, 2023
@Eric-Arellano Eric-Arellano changed the title Handle edge case in API docs: inline class Handle inline classes in API docs Feb 29, 2024
@Eric-Arellano Eric-Arellano changed the title Handle inline classes in API docs [epic] Handle inline classes in API docs Feb 29, 2024
Eric-Arellano added a commit to Qiskit/qiskit_sphinx_theme that referenced this issue Mar 1, 2024
We need to support these better in the new Qiskit docs, so it's helpful
to see how qiskit-sphinx-theme handles things. See
Qiskit/documentation#199 for more context.
@gracelindsell
Copy link
Collaborator

Designs have been finalized and can be found here

@Eric-Arellano
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Done. Thanks @arnaucasau!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
API docs epic 🏔️ infra 🏗️ UI feedback rendering/layout issues with the user interface
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants