Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 19, 2024. It is now read-only.

from polymerelements to PolymerElements (again) #209

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bartolom
Copy link
Contributor

This is a similar pull request to #174. I assume that when you merged your 2.0-preview branch into master, you have overwritten the changes again. This time I also covered the "devDependencies". Below is a copy-and-paste of the rational of this change:

This pull requests want to make this Polymer element consistent with the majority of other Polymer elements. The uppercase version "PolymerElements" is closer to real name of the github project name, like presented in the git URL.

The use of mixed case does not seem to have an effect on bower and JavaScript projects. But other languages like Java are more picky and would benefit from consistency.

This pull request is a manual follow up of PolymerLabs/tedium#47 and PolymerLabs/tedium#48 which try to do this in an automated way, but are stuck.

This is a similar pull request to PolymerElements#174. I assume that when you merged your 2.0-preview branch into master, you have overwritten the changes again. This time I also covered the "devDependencies". Below is a copy-and-paste of the rational of this change:

This pull requests want to make this Polymer element consistent with the majority of other Polymer elements. The uppercase version "PolymerElements" is closer to real name of the github project name, like presented in the git URL.

The use of mixed case does not seem to have an effect on bower and JavaScript projects. But other languages like Java are more picky and would benefit from consistency.

This pull request is a manual follow up of PolymerLabs/tedium#47 and PolymerLabs/tedium#48 which try to do this in an automated way, but are stuck.
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants