🧪 One Token Model - Pallet Funding Tests

[JuaniRios]

What?

• Change mock AccountId from u32 to u64
• Test the OTM flow inside pallet-funding

Why?

• PalletId account derivations start with a 32bit constant, so that meant the proxy-bonding escrow and the project_id escrow had the same account
• So far we only tested the proxy-bonding in a vacuum.

Testing?

• one_token_mode_bid_funding_success
• one_token_mode_bid_funding_failed
• one_token_mode_contribution_funding_success
• one_token_mode_contribution_funding_failed

Anything Else?

e2e tests need to be updated with OTM values. In another PR

[JuaniRios]

• 💥 Switch to MultiLocation in the SignedExtension #406 : 2 dependent PRs (#407 , #408 )
• ✅ New e2e tests #405
• 🧪 Test USDT transaction payment #404
• 💸 USDT transaction payments #403
• 🧪 One Token Model - Pallet Funding Tests #402 👈
• 🤝 One Token Model - Pallet Funding Integration #401
• 1️⃣ One Token Model - New Pallet Proxy Bonding #399
• main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Join @JuaniRios and the rest of your teammates on Graphite

[JuaniRios]

Merge activity

• Oct 10, 10:08 AM EDT: A user started a stack merge that includes this pull request via Graphite.
• Oct 10, 10:13 AM EDT: Graphite rebased this pull request as part of a merge.
• Oct 10, 10:14 AM EDT: A user merged this pull request with Graphite.