Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace boost::equality_comparable with explicit implementation of operator!= in pxr/usd/sdf #2237

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 3, 2023

Conversation

nvmkuruc
Copy link
Collaborator

@nvmkuruc nvmkuruc commented Feb 2, 2023

Description of Change(s)

  • Adds explicit implementation of operator!= to SdfAllowed, SdfChildrenProxy, SdfNamespaceEdit, SdfNamespaceEditDetail, and SdfUnregisteredValue
  • Equality operator test coverage has been extended to Sdf.NamespaceEdit, Sdf.NamespaceEditDetail, and Sdf.UnregisteredValue.

Fixes Issue(s)

  • I have verified that all unit tests pass with the proposed changes
  • I have submitted a signed Contributor License Agreement

@tallytalwar
Copy link
Contributor

Filed as internal issue #USD-7965

@@ -146,6 +143,7 @@ struct SdfNamespaceEditDetail :
const std::string& reason);

SDF_API bool operator==(const SdfNamespaceEditDetail& rhs) const;

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a nitpick. Since == uses "rhs", != should use "rhs" too

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

Sdf.NamespaceEdit('/A', '/B'),
"reason"
)
self.assertTrue(prototype == prototype)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The prototype == prototype test case would be more robust if it were
self.assertTrue(prototype == Sdf.NamespaceEditDetail(
 Sdf.NamespaceEditDetail.Okay,
 Sdf.NamespaceEdit('/A', '/B'),
 "reason"
 )
Same for !=

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done, I also switched the tests to use assertEqual and assertNotEqual which is preferred per https://docs.python.org/3/library/unittest.html#unittest.TestCase.assertFalse

@nvmkuruc nvmkuruc force-pushed the sdfequality branch 2 times, most recently from c4ef3f8 to 47e6cb3 Compare June 20, 2023 02:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants