Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Markdown: __map_ parameters #118

Closed
christophfroehlich opened this issue May 18, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #164
Closed

Markdown: __map_ parameters #118

christophfroehlich opened this issue May 18, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #164
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@christophfroehlich
Copy link
Collaborator

christophfroehlich commented May 18, 2023

I kindly submit a feature request for the markdown generation 😇

  • __map_ : these ones are completely ignored now

My understanding of the python/jinja scripts is too low. But if someone points me in the direction I could help to implement these.

@tylerjw
Copy link
Contributor

tylerjw commented Jun 15, 2023

@christophfroehlich thank you for the issue. I don't clearly understand your first point. Would you mind breaking it into a separate issue and leaving this about the non-support for map. I don't have time to work on this now but will happily accept PRs that fix this. I'll try to find some time to better document the python/jinja so it is easier to modify for you. I too struggle to edit it efficiently and some better design documentation would be good for me to write because it would force me to finally learn the little details.

@christophfroehlich christophfroehlich changed the title Markdown: Nested parameters and __map_ Markdown: __map_ parameters Jun 16, 2023
@christophfroehlich
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@tylerjw see #126 for a more detailed explanation of my problem with the nested structures.
Regarding the map parameters here: Somethink like we have with the JTC docs would be good enough:

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants