-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 559
SC Notes 2020 08 04
Todd Rinaldo edited this page Aug 6, 2020
·
2 revisions
- Time: 2020-08-04 13:00 GMT
- Location: Web (Jitsi)
- Invitees:
- Perl Steering Committee members
- #toolchain
- Tony Cook (TonyC)
- Paul Evans (LeoNerd)
- Karl Williamson (khw)
- Todd Rinaldo (toddr)
- James Keenan (kid51)
- H.Merijn Brand (Tux)
- Sawyer (xsawyerx)
- John Lightsey (JD)
- Nicolas R. (atoomic)
- Ricardo S. (rjbs)
- #toolchain was invited to the call.
- Invitation was accepted by one person who wanted to join but eventually could not attend.
- Recording meetings
- Mithaldu and other #toolchain members have requested recording these meetings.
- They feel the meeting notes are insufficient.
- Response:
- The group feels this is a trust issue and recording will not help.
- Participants felt confident that their positions are expressed well in the notes.
- Participants expressed they wouldn't feel comfortable being recorded.
- No other "private" meeting has been recorded including...
- The Perl 5 Core Summits, originally known as Perl 5 Hack (p5h).
- The Toolchain Summits, originally known as QA Hackathon.
- Ad-hoc meetings at conferences.
- Direct messages on IRC
- Email threads between contributors not on a particular list.
- The point of the calls is to accelerate discussion and then take those to existing channels.
- This is just the online extension of the Perl 5 Core Summits.
- We are coming to consensus on the call and then going to the mailing list for discussion.
- The agreement so far is that no decision can be made without discussion outside the meetings.
- The group feels this is a trust issue and recording will not help.
- We will seek out additional feedback on how to make the notes more encompassing of the discussion - what do people feel is truly missing?
- Mithaldu and other #toolchain members have requested recording these meetings.
- Uncertainty about what is going on.
- There is a LOT of misinformation going on about the current plan.
- Examples of misunderstandings:
- 7.0.0 is going out on August 20th.
- 7.0.0 will include additional development or fixes.
- 7.0.0 will block the existing production release schedule (5.34.0 will not be possible).
- 7.x will have whatever feature they disagree with (and that this had already been decided).
- We hope to address these with further communication on the Perl 5 Porters mailing list.
- Many people have an issue with Sawyer's email to the list explaining involvement of the Porters list.
- Some people got the impression that only the opinion of "developers" matters.
- It expressed a notion that the Porters list is not an important or valuable avenue of discussion on the language.
- We all agreed this needs to be rectified.
- Sawyer will seek additional feedback on the issues with his email in order to help correct the bad communication made.
- Discuss version bump for 7.1.0
- https://github.com/Perl/perl5/pull/18020
- Tux: -Dinc_version_list might lead to not sharing installed modules between previous versions of the language
- The version bump is meant to not change this behavior. This sounds like a new item for change?
- Someone suggested that we wait with the bump to 7.1.0 in blead
- No one at the meeting strongly opposed to keeping blead on 5.33.x.
- The meeting was at its limit and we were not able to complete this conversation.