Skip to content

Fix constructor in PRBProxy.sol contract #192

Closed Answered by PaulRBerg
luislucena16 asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

The design is intentional. The point is to let _execute handle the revert.

a new error would also be added to revert if it fails!

What is your suggestion, more specifically? A code snippet would be helpful

Replies: 1 comment 1 reply

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@luislucena16
Comment options

Answer selected by PaulRBerg
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants
Converted from issue

This discussion was converted from issue #189 on February 12, 2024 11:26.