Add generic fallback for ingredient suffix #273
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Visit the preview URL for this PR (updated for commit c320581): https://framehub-f9cfb--pr273-feat-component-suffi-j4ms9cls.web.app (expires Sat, 28 Oct 2023 03:23:08 GMT) 🔥 via Firebase Hosting GitHub Action 🌎 Sign: d479a304ab2d7841f425078578255b86dfb0d48c |
DaPigGuy
approved these changes
Oct 21, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In #271, the issue was that the suffix did not exist in our replacements. Since it should be
{ITEM NAME} {GENERIC COMPONENT NAME}in all cases, this PR adds a fallback to strip the item name from the component name.Though, it's probably fine for the fallback to be used instead of the suffixes list.