Official React bindings for Redux.
Performant and flexible.
Note: There is a project called
redux-react
on NPM that is completely unrelated to the official bindings. This documentation (and any other official Redux documentation) is forreact-redux
.
What you get from react-redux
is for React.
For React Native, import from react-redux/native
instead.
React bindings for Redux embrace the idea of dividing “smart” and “dumb” components.
It is advisable that only top-level components of your app (such as route handlers, for example) are aware of Redux. Components below them should be “dumb” and receive all data via props.
Location | Use React-Redux | To read data, they | To change data, they | |
---|---|---|---|---|
“Smart” Components | Top level, route handlers | Yes | Subscribe to Redux state | Dispatch Redux actions |
“Dumb” Components | Middle and leaf components | No | Read data from props | Invoke callbacks from props |
Let’s say we have a <Counter />
“dumb” component with a number value
prop, and an onIncrement
function prop that it will call when user presses an “Increment” button:
import { Component } from 'react';
export default class Counter extends Component {
render() {
return (
<button onClick={this.props.onIncrement}>
{this.props.value}
</button>
);
}
}
Here’s how we hook it up to the Redux Store.
We will use connect()
function provided by react-redux
to turn a “dumb” Counter
into a smart component. The connect()
function lets you specify which exact state from the Redux store your component wants to track. This lets you subscribe on any level of granularity.
import { Component } from 'react';
import { connect } from 'react-redux';
import Counter from '../components/Counter';
import { increment } from '../actionsCreators';
// Which part of the Redux global state does our component want to receive as props?
function mapStateToProps(state) {
return {
value: state.counter
};
}
// Which action creators does it want to receive by props?
function mapDispatchToProps(dispatch) {
return {
onIncrement: () => dispatch(increment())
};
}
export default connect(
mapStateToProps,
mapDispatchToProps
)(Counter);
// You can also pass an object instead of defining `mapDispatchToProps`:
// export default connect(mapStateToProps, CounterActionCreators)(Counter);
// Or you can pass `dispatch` down as a prop if you omit `mapDispatchToProps`:
// export default connect(mapStateToProps)(Counter);
// See more recipes in detailed connect() examples below.
Whether to put connect()
call in the same file as the “dumb” component, or separately, is up to you.
Ask yourself whether you'd want to reuse this component but bind it to different data, or not.
You can have many connect()
-ed components in your app at any depth, and you can even nest them. It is however preferable that you try to only connect()
top-level components such as route handlers, so the data flow in your application stays predictable.
You might have noticed that we used parens twice. This is called partial applications, and it lets people use ES7 decorator proposal syntax:
// Unstable syntax! It might change or break in production.
@connect(mapStateToProps)
export default class CounterContainer { ... }
Don’t forget decorators are experimental! And they desugar to function calls anyway as example above demonstrates.
This is the most basic usage, but connect()
supports many other different patterns: just passing the vanilla dispatch()
function down, binding multiple action creators, putting them as actions
prop, selecting parts of state and binding action creators depending on props
, and so on. Check out connect()
docs below to learn more.
Finally, how do we actually hook it up to a Redux store? We need to create the store somewhere at the root of our component hierarchy. For client apps, the root component is a good place. For server rendering, you can do this in the request handler.
The trick is to wrap the whole view hierarchy into <Provider>{() => ... }</Provider>
where Provider
is imported from react-redux
. One gotcha is that the child of Provider
must be a function. This is to work around an issue about how context (undocumented feature we have to rely on to pass Redux data to components below) works in React 0.13. In React 0.14, you will be able to put your view hierarchy in <Provider>
without wrapping it into a function.
import { Component } from 'react';
import { Provider } from 'react-redux';
class App extends Component {
render() {
// ...
}
}
const targetEl = document.getElementById('root');
React.render((
<Provider store={store}>
{() => <App />}
</Provider>
), targetEl);
Makes Redux store available to the connect()
calls in the component hierarchy below. Normally, you can’t use connect()
without wrapping the root component in <Provider>
. (If you really need to, you can manually pass store
as a prop to every connect()
ed component, but we only recommend to do this for stubbing store
in unit tests, or in non-fully-React codebases. Normally, you should just use <Provider>
.)
store
: (Redux Store): The single Redux store in your application.children
: (Function): Unlike most React components,<Provider>
accepts a function as a child with your root component. This is a temporary workaround for a React 0.13 context issue, which will be fixed when React 0.14 comes out.
React.render(
<Provider store={store}>
{() => <MyRootComponent />}
</Provider>,
rootEl
);
Router.run(routes, Router.HistoryLocation, (Handler, routerState) => { // note "routerState" here
React.render(
<Provider store={store}>
{() => <Handler routerState={routerState} />} // note "routerState" here: important to pass it down
</Provider>,
document.getElementById('root')
);
});
React.render(
<Provider store={store}>
{() => <Router history={history}>...</Router>}
</Provider>,
targetEl
);
Connects a React component to a Redux store.
-
[
mapStateToProps(state, [ownProps]): stateProps
] (Function): If specified, the component will subscribe to Redux store updates. Any time it updates,mapStateToProps
will be called. Its result must be a plain object, and it will be merged into the component’s props. If you omit it, the component will not be subscribed to the Redux store. IfownProps
is specified as a second argument thenmapStateToProps
will be re-invoked whenever the component receives new props. -
[
mapDispatchToProps(dispatch, [ownProps]): dispatchProps
] (Object or Function): If an object is passed, each function inside it will be assumed to be a Redux action creator. An object with the same function names, but bound to a Redux store, will be merged into the component’s props. If a function is passed, it will be givendispatch
. It’s up to you to return an object that somehow usesdispatch
to bind action creators in your own way. (Tip: you may usebindActionCreators()
helper from Redux.) If you omit it, the default implementation just injectsdispatch
into your component’s props. IfownProps
is specified as a second argument thenmapStateToProps
will be re-invoked whenever the component receives new props. -
[
mergeProps(stateProps, dispatchProps, ownProps): props
] (Function): If specified, it is passed the result ofmapStateToProps()
,mapDispatchToProps()
, and the parentprops
. The plain object you return from it will be passed as props to the wrapped component. You may specify this function to select a slice of the state based on props, or to bind action creators to a particular variable from props. If you omit it,{ ...ownProps, ...stateProps, ...dispatchProps }
is used by default.
A React component class that injects state and action creators into your component according to the specified options.
-
It needs to be invoked two times. First time with its arguments described above, and second time, with the component:
connect(mapStateToProps, mapDispatchToProps, mergeProps)(MyComponent)
. -
The
mapStateToProps
function takes a single argument of the entire Redux store’s state and returns an object to be passed as props. It is often called a selector. Use reselect to efficiently compose selectors and compute derived data. -
To use
connect()
, the root component of your app must be wrapped into<Provider>{() => ... }</Provider>
before being rendered. You may also passstore
as a prop to theconnect()
ed component, but it's not recommended because it's just too much trouble. Only do this for in non-fully-React codebases or to stub store in a unit test.
export default connect()(TodoApp);
export default connect(state => state)(TodoApp);
function mapStateToProps(state) {
return { todos: state.todos };
}
export default connect(mapStateToProps)(TodoApp);
import * as actionCreators from './actionCreators';
function mapStateToProps(state) {
return { todos: state.todos };
}
export default connect(mapStateToProps, actionCreators)(TodoApp);
import * as actionCreators from './actionCreators';
import { bindActionCreators } from 'redux';
function mapStateToProps(state) {
return { todos: state.todos };
}
function mapDispatchToProps(dispatch) {
return { actions: bindActionCreators(actionCreators, dispatch) };
}
export default connect(mapStateToProps, mapDispatchToProps)(TodoApp);
import { addTodo } from './actionCreators';
import { bindActionCreators } from 'redux';
function mapStateToProps(state) {
return { todos: state.todos };
}
function mapDispatchToProps(dispatch) {
return bindActionCreators({ addTodo }, dispatch);
}
export default connect(mapStateToProps, mapDispatchToProps)(TodoApp);
import * as todoActionCreators from './todoActionCreators';
import * as counterActionCreators from './counterActionCreators';
import { bindActionCreators } from 'redux';
function mapStateToProps(state) {
return { todos: state.todos };
}
function mapDispatchToProps(dispatch) {
return {
todoActions: bindActionCreators(todoActionCreators, dispatch),
counterActions: bindActionCreators(counterActionCreators, dispatch)
};
}
export default connect(mapStateToProps, mapDispatchToProps)(TodoApp);
import * as todoActionCreators from './todoActionCreators';
import * as counterActionCreators from './counterActionCreators';
import { bindActionCreators } from 'redux';
function mapStateToProps(state) {
return { todos: state.todos };
}
function mapDispatchToProps(dispatch) {
return {
actions: bindActionCreators({ ...todoActionCreators, ...counterActionCreators }, dispatch)
};
}
export default connect(mapStateToProps, mapDispatchToProps)(TodoApp);
import * as todoActionCreators from './todoActionCreators';
import * as counterActionCreators from './counterActionCreators';
import { bindActionCreators } from 'redux';
function mapStateToProps(state) {
return { todos: state.todos };
}
function mapDispatchToProps(dispatch) {
return bindActionCreators(Object.assign({}, todoActionCreators, counterActionCreators), dispatch);
}
export default connect(mapStateToProps, mapDispatchToProps)(TodoApp);
import * as actionCreators from './actionCreators';
function mapStateToProps(state, ownProps) {
return { todos: state.todos[ownProps.userId] };
}
export default connect(mapStateToProps)(TodoApp);
import * as actionCreators from './actionCreators';
function mapStateToProps(state) {
return { todos: state.todos };
}
function mergeProps(stateProps, dispatchProps, ownProps) {
return Object.assign({}, ownProps, {
todos: stateProps.todos[ownProps.userId],
addTodo: (text) => dispatchProps.addTodo(ownProps.userId, text)
});
}
export default connect(mapStateToProps, actionCreators, mergeProps)(TodoApp);
Make sure to check out Troubleshooting Redux first.
See the link above. In short,
- Reducers should never mutate state, they must return new objects, or React Redux won’t see the updates.
- Make sure you either bind action creators with
mapDispatchToState
argument toconnect()
or withbindActionCreators()
method, or that you manually calldispatch()
. Just calling yourMyActionCreators.addTodo()
function won’t work because it just returns an action, but not dispatches it.
If you’re using React Router 0.13, you might bump into this problem. The solution is simple: whenever you use <RouteHandler>
or the Handler
provided by Router.run
, pass the router state to it.
Root view:
Router.run(routes, Router.HistoryLocation, (Handler, routerState) => { // note "routerState" here
React.render(
<Provider store={store}>
{() => <Handler routerState={routerState} />} // note "routerState" here
</Provider>,
document.getElementById('root')
);
});
Nested view:
render() {
// Keep passing it down
return <RouteHandler routerState={this.props.routerState} />;
}
Conveniently, this gives your components access to the router state! You can also upgrade to React Router 1.0 which shouldn’t have this problem. (Let us know if it does!)
If you have context issues,
- Make sure you don’t have duplicate React on the page.
- Make sure you didn’t forget to wrap your root component in
<Provider>
. - If you use React Router, something like
<Provider>{() => routes}</Provider>
won’t work. Due to the way context works in React 0.13, it’s important that the<Provider>
children are created inside that function. Just referencing an outside variable doesn’t do the trick. Instead of<Provider>{() => routes}</Provider>
, write<Provider>{createRoutes}</Provider>
wherecreateRoutes()
is a function that actually creates (and returns) the route configuration.
MIT