Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix for nim 2.2, provide all generic params when instantiating Nothing #7

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 10, 2024

Conversation

metagn
Copy link
Contributor

@metagn metagn commented Aug 31, 2024

The calls to Nothing are only given 1 and 2 generic parameters when they both take 3, this compiles due to bugs in Nim. To remove the dependency on this behavior of the Nim compiler, the remaining generic parameters are now provided.

The calls to `Nothing` are only given 1 and 2 generic parameters when they both take 3, this compiles due to bugs in Nim. To remove the dependency on this behavior of the Nim compiler, the remaining generic parameters are now provided.
Araq pushed a commit to nim-lang/Nim that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2024
fixes #16376

The way the compiler handled generic proc instantiations in calls (like
`foo[int](...)`) up to this point was to instantiate `foo[int]`, create
a symbol for the instantiated proc (or a symchoice for multiple procs
excluding ones with mismatching generic param counts), then perform
overload resolution on this symbol/symchoice. The exception to this was
when the called symbol was already a symchoice node, in which case it
wasn't instantiated and overloading was called directly ([these
lines](https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/blob/b7b1313d21deb687adab2b4a162e716ba561a26b/compiler/semexprs.nim#L3366-L3371)).

This has several problems:

* Templates and macros can't create instantiated symbols, so they
couldn't participate in overloaded explicit generic instantiations,
causing the issue #16376.
* Every single proc that can be instantiated with the given generic
params is fully instantiated including the body. #9997 is about this but
isn't fixed here since the instantiation isn't in a call.

The way overload resolution handles explicit instantiations by itself is
also buggy:

* It doesn't check constraints.
* It allows only partially providing the generic parameters, which makes
sense for implicit generics, but can cause ambiguity in overloading.

Here is how this PR deals with these problems:

* Overload resolution now always handles explicit generic instantiations
in calls, in `initCandidate`, as long as the symbol resolves to a
routine symbol.
* Overload resolution now checks the generic params for constraints and
correct parameter count (ignoring implicit params). If these don't
match, the entire overload is considered as not matching and not
instantiated.
* Special error messages are added for mismatching/missing/extra generic
params. This is almost all of the diff in `semcall`.
* Procs with matching generic parameters now instantiate only the type
of the signature in overload resolution, not the proc itself, which also
works for templates and macros.

Unfortunately we can't entirely remove instantiations because overload
resolution can't handle some cases with uninstantiated types even though
it's resolved in the binding (see the last 2 blocks in
`texplicitgenerics`). There are also some instantiation issues with
default params that #24005 didn't fix but I didn't want this to become
the 3rd huge generics PR in a row so I didn't dive too deep into trying
to fix them. There is still a minor instantiation fix in `semtypinst`
though for subscripts in calls.

Additional changes:

* Overloading of `[]` wasn't documented properly, it somewhat is now
because we need to mention the limitation that it can't be done for
generic procs/types.
* Tests can now enable the new type mismatch errors with just
`-d:testsConciseTypeMismatch` in the command.

Package PRs:

- using fork for now:
[combparser](PMunch/combparser#7) (partial
generic instantiation)
- merged: [cligen](c-blake/cligen#233) (partial
generic instantiation but non-overloaded + template)
- merged: [neo](andreaferretti/neo#56) (trying
to instantiate template with no generic param)
@metagn metagn changed the title provide all generic params when instantiating Nothing fix for nim 2.2, provide all generic params when instantiating Nothing Oct 9, 2024
@narimiran
Copy link

@PMunch anything stopping this from getting merged?

@PMunch
Copy link
Owner

PMunch commented Oct 10, 2024

Oh sorry, not really. I was mostly just waiting for the changes to stabalize and the Nim version to be released. I'll merge it now :)

@PMunch PMunch merged commit e582c43 into PMunch:master Oct 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants