Replaced wrong 800x480 resolution .bmp files for AM070 machine with corrected 1280x800 resolution files #117
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Added new machine for 7" display Ampire, type AM-1280800P3TZQW-00H-AMPI, resolution: 1280x800, Brightness: 1500 cd/m2, LVDS interface, 24-bit color depth
Update README.md
replacing 800x480 resolution .bmp file with correct 1280x800 resolution .bmp file
replacing 800x480 resolution .bmp file with correct 1280x800 resolution .bmp file
replacing 800x480 resolution .bmp file with correct 1280x800 resolution .bmp file
replacing 800x480 resolution .bmp file with correct 1280x800 resolution .bmp file
replacing 800x480 resolution .bmp file with correct 1280x800 resolution .bmp file
replacing 800x480 resolution .bmp file with correct 1280x800 resolution .bmp file
replacing 800x480 resolution .bmp file with correct 1280x800 resolution .bmp file
replacing 800x480 resolution .bmp file with correct 1280x800 resolution .bmp file
replaced 800x480 resolution .bmp files with correct 1280x800 resolution .bmp files
kedder
reviewed
Feb 2, 2021
README.md
Outdated
| @@ -1,53 +0,0 @@ | |||
| # meta-openvario | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this file removed by accident?
|
Hi Andrey,well, yes and no. I made modification to readme.md two weeks ago (together with adding AM070 machine). I added "sudo" before docker, note about new machine AM070 and note about 2 possibilities of compilation - bitbake openvario-image or bitbake openvario-image. The last note was rejected, therefore I deleted the file so it doesn't seems I'm trying to force this modification again even it was already rejected. This pull request is just about replacing 8 .bmp files, which I uploaded in original 800x480 resolution 2 weeks ago by mistake.Sorry when I messed something up.DanielDňa Tue, 02 Feb 2021 02:09:49 -0800 Andrey Lebedev napísal:> @kedder commented on this pull request.> > > >> @@ -1,53 +0,0 @@> -# meta-openvario> > Is this file removed by accident?
> -- > You are receiving this because you authored the thread.> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:> #117 (review)
|
|
Hi Andrey,I put the readme.md back to my fork. It's the same as it's now in main branch.DanielDňa Tue, 02 Feb 2021 02:09:49 -0800 Andrey Lebedev napísal:> @kedder commented on this pull request.> > > >> @@ -1,53 +0,0 @@> -# meta-openvario> > Is this file removed by accident?> > -- > You are receiving this because you authored the thread.> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:> #117 (review)
|
kedder
approved these changes
Feb 2, 2021
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@glidero, thanks, it looks good now.
@linuxianer99 feel free to merge. I recommend using "Squash and Merge", because there are lots of fixup commits.
linuxianer99
approved these changes
Feb 2, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.