chat history #9
chat history #9
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe changes in the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant PersonaService
participant QuestionSolversService
participant ChatMessageSolver
User->>PersonaService: send chat message
PersonaService->>QuestionSolversService: call chat_completion
QuestionSolversService->>ChatMessageSolver: get_chat_completion
ChatMessageSolver-->>QuestionSolversService: return response
QuestionSolversService-->>PersonaService: return response
PersonaService-->>User: send response
Warning Rate limit exceeded@JarbasAl has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 23 minutes and 50 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
ovos_persona/solvers.py (1)
56-56: Fix grammatical error in log messageThe log message on line 56~ has a grammatical error. It should read "does not support chat history!" instead of "does not supported chat history!".
Apply this diff to correct the error:
-LOG.debug(f"{module} does not supported chat history!") +LOG.debug(f"{module} does not support chat history!")ovos_persona/__init__.py (1)
167-170: Simplify conditional assignment with a ternary operatorThe
if-elseblock can be simplified using a ternary operator for better readability.Apply this diff to refactor the code:
- if ans is None: - ans = m[1] # track answer - else: # merge multi speak answers - ans = f"{ans}. {m[1]}" + ans = m[1] if ans is None else f"{ans}. {m[1]}"🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff
167-170: Use ternary operator
ans = m[1] if ans is None else f"{ans}. {m[1]}"instead ofif-else-block(SIM108)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
ovos_persona/__init__.py(9 hunks)ovos_persona/solvers.py(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff
ovos_persona/__init__.py
167-170: Use ternary operator ans = m[1] if ans is None else f"{ans}. {m[1]}" instead of if-else-block
(SIM108)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
ovos_persona/__init__.py (2)
132-135: Ensure all calls to 'chatbox_ask' accommodate the new 'message' parameter
The chatbox_ask method signature now includes a message: Message = None parameter. Verify that existing calls to this method are updated to include this parameter if necessary, or handle it appropriately to avoid potential errors.
Run the following script to identify all calls to chatbox_ask:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Identify all usages of 'chatbox_ask' to ensure compatibility with the new signature.
# Test: Search for 'chatbox_ask(' in the codebase.
# Expect: Calls should match the new method signature.
rg 'chatbox_ask\(' -A 384-85: Verify the impact of changing 'load_intent_files' from class method to instance method
The method load_intent_files has been changed from a class method to an instance method. Ensure that all references and calls to this method are updated accordingly to prevent any runtime errors.
Run the following script to locate any class method references to load_intent_files:
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different search strategy to verify the impact of this change.
Let me search for any usage of this method within the codebase to ensure we have a complete picture.
Method change from @classmethod to instance method is safe
The git history shows that load_intent_files was previously decorated with @classmethod, but there are no direct class method calls (PersonaService.load_intent_files()) found in the codebase. The method is only used internally within instance methods, making this change safe.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find references to 'load_intent_files' being called as a class method.
# Test: Search for 'PersonaService.load_intent_files(' in the codebase.
# Expect: No calls should reference it as a class method.
rg 'PersonaService\.load_intent_files\('
Length of output: 1451
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any references to load_intent_files in the codebase
rg "load_intent_files" -A 2
# Also search for any class method decorators (@classmethod) near load_intent_files
# to verify if it was previously a class method
rg -B 2 "def load_intent_files"
Length of output: 406
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any calls to load_intent_files
rg -B 3 -A 3 "\.(load_intent_files)"
# Also check the git history to see if it was previously decorated as a classmethod
git log -p | rg -B 3 -A 3 "load_intent_files"
Length of output: 589
needs OpenVoiceOS/ovos-plugin-manager#286
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor