Do a first round of UX improvements

[slifty]

I'm keeping this general for right now just as a "meta" issue since this will be a little more like jazz than spec.

The current UX was built in order to make sure the backend worked and to provide a baseline of functionality -- it needs to be improved with the user in mind.

This includes things like:

1. Basic layout improvements.
2. Removing unimplemented features.
3. Adding some color.

This probably shouldn't include larger things like #17 or replacing our autocomplete with a more fully featured one (e.g. one that supports keyboard commands out of the box), but that will come next.

[kfogel]

I sent (most of) this in email, but just to put it here for reference / archiving / proper transparency:

The top URL should be https://cgap.opentechstrategies.com/poc-demo/. (We should have a redirect from the old :8080 instance (sorry, unanticipated side effect of impulsive preview access).)

Under that, two paths:

• gms-apply: New name for what is currently ux/apply.
• search: New name for what is currently ux/review.

Now, a couple of things:

1. I realize this would get rid of the ux component. If there's a reason why that component is there, that I just don't understand yet, then let's talk about it -- I'd at least like to understand the tradeoffs before having a firm opinion.
2. Maybe the reason you currently have .../review/ as the default search path is because it works the same way as the apply screen does, just with some fields hidden at first? Happy to chat about that too. But based on the goals for our intended audience, presenting the search screen as "Search" (both in title and URL, but I can do the title change as part of some more extensive text changes I'll be submitting) would make more sense. They're not coming to that screen to review proposals, they're coming there to find organizations.

[kfogel]

And Jim is updating the sample data, so we should pull in the new data (I assume that's costless).