-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 437
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixed incorrect datetime in block, ref #1525 #2854
Conversation
possibly related to #2739 |
@kiatng what do you think about this? |
This is a better fix of the original issue. Is this going to be in v20? If it is and if there are custom code in the wild that uses |
Test result comparing original v19
|
Co-authored-by: Ng Kiat Siong <[email protected]>
@kiatng thanks. Would be nice to had a unit-test here. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should not have serious effect in v20.
so the idea is to port it to v20 right? otherwise it would be actually worse to maintain |
Add @kiatng fix to v19 and port/replace it to v20 was my plan ... ❔ |
Closing this PR was a wrong decision. It was a better fix for that issue. |
@addison74 there is a follow-up PR. (#2940) |
Description (*)
#1525 was added to v20 only, because it was a BC breaking change. This PR solves that issue w/o changing existing methods signature. (code from 1525)
Not sure about this change ... changing ...
Related Pull Requests
Fixed Issues (if relevant)
Manual testing scenarios (*)
Contribution checklist (*)