-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The builder clones itself before enrichment #2117
Merged
velo
merged 10 commits into
OpenFeign:master
from
vitalijr2:feign-builder-wraps-over-already-wrapped-fields
Aug 21, 2023
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a9d8998
Enrichment of a clone
vitalijr2 52c4d85
Merge branch 'master' into feign-builder-wraps-over-already-wrapped-f…
vitalijr2 2640ceb
Merge branch 'master' into feign-builder-wraps-over-already-wrapped-f…
vitalijr2 87ed0af
Alternative internal builder process
velo dace3b5
Merge branch 'master' of github.com:OpenFeign/feign into feign-builde…
velo 1b6f78f
build(deps): bump io.sundr:sundr-maven-plugin from 0.100.2 to 0.100.3…
dependabot[bot] 227be3e
Alternative internal builder process
velo 2e09730
Merge branch 'feign-builder-wraps-over-already-wrapped-fields' of git…
velo 9981206
Alternative internal builder process
velo 540370d
Alternative internal builder process
velo File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My major concern is that in the future, someone will access a field directly, forget the enrichBuilder prefix
What if, we move the builder body to a new method, and the we invoke the "internalBuild()" in the enriched instance?