-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[BUG] x-enum-varnames is underspecified #3246
Comments
👍 Thanks for opening this issue! The team will review the labels and make any necessary changes. |
Any update on this? |
ABCEnum: Why is this not working??? |
openapi-generator (which is the only generator I am aware of which supports x-enum-varnames) uses x-enum-varnames as identifiers verbatim. Therefore, they must be valid identifiers (in all languages). Unfortunately, whatever capitalization convention we use will look weird in some languages. Choose a common one for now. See OpenAPITools/openapi-generator#3246 for discussion. Signed-off-by: Kevin Locke <[email protected]>
openapi-generator (which is the only generator I am aware of which supports x-enum-varnames) uses x-enum-varnames as identifiers verbatim. Therefore, they must be valid identifiers (in all languages). Unfortunately, whatever capitalization convention we use will look weird in some languages. Choose a common one for now. See OpenAPITools/openapi-generator#3246 for discussion. Signed-off-by: Kevin Locke <[email protected]>
openapi-generator (which is the only generator I am aware of which supports x-enum-varnames) uses x-enum-varnames as identifiers verbatim. Therefore, they must be valid identifiers (in all languages). Unfortunately, whatever capitalization convention we use will look weird in some languages. Choose a common one for now. See OpenAPITools/openapi-generator#3246 for discussion. Signed-off-by: Kevin Locke <[email protected]>
openapi-generator (which is the only generator I am aware of which supports x-enum-varnames) uses x-enum-varnames as identifiers verbatim. Therefore, they must be valid identifiers (in all languages). Unfortunately, whatever capitalization convention we use will look weird in some languages. Choose a common one for now. See OpenAPITools/openapi-generator#3246 for discussion. Signed-off-by: Kevin Locke <[email protected]>
Description
Support for the
x-enum-varnames
extension was added in #917 to support specifying variable names for enumeration values (e.g. for numeric values, as in #893 (comment)). The documentation from #2010 suggests that the names will undergo language-specific normalization (as enum values would), but they do not, which can result in broken code.openapi-generator version
The issue has been present since #917 was merged. Tested on
master
.OpenAPI declaration file content or url
Command line used for generation
openapi-generator-cli.jar generate -i openapi.yaml -g java -o bad-x-enum-varnames-java
Steps to reproduce
Partly Cloudy
being an invalid variable name.Suggest a fix
The appropriate fix depends on the desired semantics of
x-enum-varnames
:x-enum-varnames
should be a natural language name, then the values should be converted to identifiers in the same way as enum values (as suggested in the documentation), which would fix the above example.x-enum-varnames
must be a valid identifier (in every language which can be generated) then the documentation should be updated to clarify that. (Ideally the code generation would also fail more gracefully.)A problem with the first option is that it prevents an existing use case of overriding the generator convention, as described in swagger-api/swagger-codegen#7466 (comment), and could change the generated API by changing the generated names (depending on how identifier normalization is done).
A problem with the second option is that different languages have different casing conventions for enumeration values and there's no way to satisfy them all. Should the spec use
PARTLY_CLOUDY
,PartlyCloudy
, orpartlyCloudy
forx-enum-varnames
? Any choice will be unconventional in several languages. Also, different languages have different rules for valid identifiers and requiring spec authors to comply with all of them is burdensome.Thanks for considering,
Kevin
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: