-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 51
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixes #1929 hill transporter issue #1941
Conversation
src/Db/Dump/PKSimDB_dump.txt
Outdated
@@ -82970,7 +82970,7 @@ INSERT INTO tab_rate_generic_molecules VALUES('LinksCommon','MetabolizationSpeci | |||
INSERT INTO tab_rate_generic_molecules VALUES('LinksCommon','MetabolizationSpecific_Hill',372,'DRUG','C',0); | |||
INSERT INTO tab_rate_generic_molecules VALUES('LinksCommon','MetabolizationSpecific_MM',370,'DRUG','CP',0); | |||
INSERT INTO tab_rate_generic_molecules VALUES('LinksCommon','MetabolizationSpecific_MM',372,'DRUG','C',0); | |||
INSERT INTO tab_rate_generic_molecules VALUES('LinksCommon','MucosaActiveInfluxFromLumen_Hill',368,'DRUG','TM',1); | |||
INSERT INTO tab_rate_generic_molecules VALUES('LinksCommon','MucosaActiveInfluxFromLumen_Hill',366,'DRUG','TM',1); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This was Target|Transporter. Now Source|Transporter
It needs to be Target in fact because the transporter is not defined in Lumen but in the Mucosa compartment...that's right? @Yuri05 ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
no, that's not right. Is probably a relic from V9 (where all GI processes were defined with source in Mucosa and Influx-transports had the negative rate to compensate this)
Must be defined Lumen=>Mucosa (same as e.g. MucosaActiveInfluxFromLumen_MM)
MucosaActiveInfluxFromLumen_MM is defined like this as well |
And setting path to be SOURCE/ doesn't work. So clearly the transporter is not defined here...we might have a little problem to check |
@PavelBal Is it by design that the Lumen => Mucosa transporter observed the Transporter conc. in Mucosa? |
@Yuri05 That's the same for |
ok, after some thinking: that's correct. We place now the basolateral transporter ( |
Yes, it makes sense from the physiological point of view. |
No description provided.