-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 51
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Explanation for Phenotype? #2059
Comments
Metabolizing enzyme is clear I guess, so we would need an explanation only for the phenotype. P.S. For the protein name (and for the phenotype, in case we would like to add some predefined values): I would include into the explanation that the value can be also entered as free text and not only selected from the list. |
I had to think hard to understand what is required here :D How about just "Profile name"? With a hint "Name of this specific expression profile. You can define multiple expression profiles for the same protein". The different profiles must not represent only different phenotypes, it could also be e.g. profiles from different sources (e.g. one from RT-PCR, one EST, one "manual"). |
Ok so we rename phenotype to sthg else? Phenotype was a proposal from @StephanSchaller but I agree that this might be confusing |
"Description"? |
Ok this is becoming urgent as I am drafting the documentation and taking screenshots. How do we name this field? |
Category, subtype.. |
What is this entry good for. Only as info, or does it have any functional purpose (e.g. as "metabolizing enzyme")? |
Phenotype is a very general description of waht is exactly needed here and would probably have fit the purpose. If that really confusion (why?), then I would prefer Pavel's suggestion "Profile name". |
I actually also like "Phenotype", it is the matter of proper tooltip to make sure user knows what to enter. E.g. "Enter a unique name for the expression of this protein. Multiple expression profiles of the same protein are allowed to describe different phenotypes or disease states". |
Phenotype it is then. |
I am sure people won't understand what's required here.
Should we give an example or add some text explaining ?
@StephanSchaller @PavelBal @Yuri05
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: