You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
AT series 0 is the same as AT series 1. For 1-based indexing, the 0 index should be one back from the current position, the -1 index two back, and so on.
This bug prevents calculation of the index argument, which is necessary for simulating 0-based indexing amongst other things. Both blocks and strings are affected.
Submitted by: BrianH
AT series 0 is the same as AT series 1. For 1-based indexing, the 0 index should be one back from the current position, the -1 index two back, and so on.
This bug prevents calculation of the index argument, which is necessary for simulating 0-based indexing amongst other things. Both blocks and strings are affected.
Note: R2 also has this bug.
Imported from: CureCode [ Version: alpha 33 Type: Bug Platform: All Category: Unspecified Reproduce: Always Fixed-in:none ]
Imported from: metaeducation#609
Comments:
Submitted by: BrianH
According to the index compromise in #2117 this is not a bug.
Submitted by: abolka
According to #2117 a part of this ticket is still important:
AT series 0
should cause an error. But it's best to track that in a separate ticket.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: