Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Invalid results when converting 64 bit vectors to binary #2590

Closed
Oldes opened this issue Feb 15, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Invalid results when converting 64 bit vectors to binary #2590

Oldes opened this issue Feb 15, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
Datatype: binary! Datatype: vector! Test.written Type.bug

Comments

@Oldes
Copy link
Owner

Oldes commented Feb 15, 2024

Current behaviour:

>> to binary! #[i8! [1 2 3]]
== #{010203}

>> to binary! #[i16! [1 2 3]]
== #{010002000300}

>> to binary! #[i32! [1 2 3]]
== #{010000000200000003000000}

>> to binary! #[i64! [1 2 3]]
== #{010203} ;<========= Wrong!

>> to binary! #[f32! [1 2 3]]
== #{0000803F0000004000004040}

>> to binary! #[f64! [1 2 3]]
== #{000000} ;<========= Wrong!

As it is in unit tests, it must be some regression.
@Oldes
Copy link
Owner Author

Oldes commented Feb 15, 2024

The regression is from this commit: Oldes/Rebol3@9715d12

Oldes added a commit to Oldes/Rebol3 that referenced this issue Feb 15, 2024
@Oldes
FIX: regression when creating 64 bit vectors
987af6a 
resolves: Oldes/Rebol-issues#2590
Oldes added a commit to Oldes/Rebol3 that referenced this issue Feb 16, 2024
@Oldes
FIX: correct fix of regression when creating 64 bit vectors
6956360 
resolves: Oldes/Rebol-issues#2590
Oldes added a commit to Oldes/Rebol3 that referenced this issue Feb 17, 2024
@Oldes
FIX: correct fix of regression when creating 64 bit vectors
0775021 
resolves: Oldes/Rebol-issues#2590
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Datatype: binary! Datatype: vector! Test.written Type.bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@Oldes