EQUIV? decimal! comparison not exact enough to be transitive

[Siskin-Bot]

Submitted by: Ladislav

the original idea was that the EQUIV? comparison would be finer than the EQUAL? function and transitive. The test below yielding False proves that the EQUIV? comparison isn't transitive currently.

[not equiv? to decimal! #{3FD3333333333333} to decimal! #{3FD3333333333334}]

---

^{Imported from: CureCode [ Version: alpha 76 Type: Bug Platform: All Category: Native Reproduce: Always Fixed-in:none ]
Imported from: metaeducation#1134}

Comments:

Rebolbot commented on Jul 23, 2009:

Submitted by: BrianH

Changed to a bug, and reworded the summary accordingly.

---

Rebolbot commented on Nov 4, 2010:

Submitted by: Ladislav

in the core-tests suite

---

Rebolbot mentioned this issue on Jan 22, 2016:
[Epic] Backwards-incompatible API changes, for the greater good

---

Rebolbot added Type.bug and Test.written on Jan 12, 2016

---