You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Should we add an option to define failures based on row count? For example, if it is a large database 100 records that fail still looks like 0.00% failure because of the sig figs we are using. In this example, I see records that occur in the year 2100 but it did not flag as a fail. I still want to know that this is happening and adding a definition based on row count could do that.
Or add row count as a column?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Should we add an option to define failures based on row count? For example, if it is a large database 100 records that fail still looks like 0.00% failure because of the sig figs we are using. In this example, I see records that occur in the year 2100 but it did not flag as a fail. I still want to know that this is happening and adding a definition based on row count could do that.
Or add row count as a column?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: