[13.0] Remove unique constraint on packaging type in cubiscan #944
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The constraint is moved to the module stock_packaging_type: OCA/product-attribute#654 Having this constraint in this module doesn't make sense.
This was referenced Jul 21, 2020
sebalix
approved these changes
Jul 22, 2020
Tonow-c2c
approved these changes
Jul 22, 2020
|
/ocabot merge patch |
|
What a great day to merge this nice PR. Let's do it! |
|
Congratulations, your PR was merged at e4021e5. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️ |
CarlosRoca13
pushed a commit
to Tecnativa/stock-logistics-warehouse
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 16, 2021
CarlosRoca13
pushed a commit
to Tecnativa/stock-logistics-warehouse
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 16, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The constraint is moved to the module stock_packaging_type:
OCA/product-attribute#654
Having this constraint in this module doesn't make sense.