Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[16.0][FIX] stock_inventory_preparation_filter: update invisible field correctly. #2024

Merged

Conversation

DavidJForgeFlow
Copy link
Contributor

Bug found on #2017

@ForgeFlow

@DavidJForgeFlow DavidJForgeFlow force-pushed the 16.0-fix-stock_invenotry_preparation_filter branch from 25e763b to ff42d49 Compare May 7, 2024 09:41
Copy link
Contributor

@LoisRForgeFlow LoisRForgeFlow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@JoanSForgeFlow JoanSForgeFlow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great!

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has the approved label and has been created more than 5 days ago. It should therefore be ready to merge by a maintainer (or a PSC member if the concerned addon has no declared maintainer). 🤖

@LoisRForgeFlow
Copy link
Contributor

/ocabot merge minor

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR looks fantastic, let's merge it!
Prepared branch 16.0-ocabot-merge-pr-2024-by-LoisRForgeFlow-bump-minor, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit e4868e0 into OCA:16.0 May 29, 2024
5 checks passed
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at f84bce2. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

@LoisRForgeFlow LoisRForgeFlow deleted the 16.0-fix-stock_invenotry_preparation_filter branch May 29, 2024 08:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants